Digital image analysis of membrane connectivity is a robust measure of HER2 immunostains

被引:77
作者
Brugmann, Anja [1 ]
Eld, Mikkel [1 ]
Lelkaitis, Giedrius [1 ]
Nielsen, Soren [2 ]
Grunkin, Michael [3 ]
Hansen, Johan D. [3 ]
Foged, Niels T. [3 ]
Vyberg, Mogens [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Hosp, Aarhus Univ Hosp, Inst Pathol, DK-9100 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, NordiQC Aalborg Hosp, Inst Pathol, DK-9100 Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Visiopharm AA, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark
关键词
Breast cancer; HER2; Image analysis; Immunohistochemistry; FISH; Tissue microarray; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA; BREAST-CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION; HER-2/NEU EXPRESSION; TISSUE MICROARRAYS; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; AMPLIFICATION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; HISTOPATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-011-1514-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new software, HER2-CONNECTTM, for digital image analysis of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer specimens. The software assesses immunohistochemical (IHC) staining reactions of HER2 based on an algorithm evaluating the cell membrane connectivity. The HER2-CONNECTTM algorithm was aligned to match digital image scorings of HER2 performed by 5 experienced assessors in a training set and confirmed in a separate validation set. The training set consisted of 167 breast carcinoma tissue core images in which the assessors individually and blinded outlined regions of interest and gave their HER2 score 0/1+/2+/3+ to the specific tumor region. The validation set consisted of 86 core images where the result of the automated image analysis software was correlated to the scores provided by the 5 assessors. HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on all cores and used as a reference standard. The overall agreement between the image analysis software and the digital scorings of the 5 assessors was 92.1% (Cohen's Kappa: 0.859) in the training set and 92.3% (Cohen's Kappa: 0.864) in the validation set. The image analysis sensitivity was 99.2% and specificity 100% when correlated to FISH. In conclusion, the Visiopharm HER2 IHC algorithm HER2-CONNECTTM can discriminate between amplified and non-amplified cases with high accuracy and diminish the equivocal category and thereby provides a promising supplementary diagnostic tool to increase consistency in HER2 assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Predicting the HER2 status of breast cancer from basic histopathology data: an analysis of 1500 breast cancers as part of the HER2000 International Study [J].
Bilous, M ;
Ades, C ;
Armes, J ;
Bishop, J ;
Brown, R ;
Cooke, B ;
Cummings, M ;
Farshid, G ;
Field, A ;
Morey, A ;
McKenzie, P ;
Raymond, W ;
Robbins, P ;
Tan, L .
BREAST, 2003, 12 (02) :92-98
[2]   SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation [J].
Blewitt, Marnie E. ;
Gendrel, Anne-Valerie ;
Pang, Zhenyi ;
Sparrow, Duncan B. ;
Whitelaw, Nadia ;
Craig, Jeffrey M. ;
Apedaile, Anwyn ;
Hilton, Douglas J. ;
Dunwoodie, Sally L. ;
Brockdorff, Neil ;
Kay, Graham F. ;
Whitelaw, Emma .
NATURE GENETICS, 2008, 40 (05) :663-669
[3]   HER-2 status in breast cancer - Correlation of gene amplification by FISH with immunohistochemistry expression using advanced cellular imaging system [J].
Ciampa, Armando ;
Xu, Bo ;
Ayata, Gamze ;
Baiyee, Daniel ;
Wallace, Jan ;
Wertheimer, Michael ;
Edmiston, Kathryn ;
Khan, Ashraf .
APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2006, 14 (02) :132-137
[4]   Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer [J].
Di Palma, S. ;
Collins, N. ;
Faulkes, C. ;
Ping, B. ;
Ferns, G. ;
Haagsma, B. ;
Layer, G. ;
Kissin, M. W. ;
Cook, M. G. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (09) :1067-1068
[5]   Image analysis as an adjunct to manual HER-2 immunohistochemical review: a diagnostic tool to standardize interpretation [J].
Dobson, Lynne ;
Conway, Catherine ;
Hanley, Alan ;
Johnson, Alex ;
Costello, Sean ;
O'Grady, Anthony ;
Connolly, Yvonne ;
Magee, Hilary ;
O'Shea, Daniel ;
Jeffers, Michael ;
Kay, Elaine .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 57 (01) :27-38
[6]   HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques [J].
Ellis, CM ;
Dyson, MJ ;
Stephenson, TJ ;
Maltby, EL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 58 (07) :710-714
[7]   Assessment of two automated imaging systems in evaluating estrogen receptor status in breast carcinoma [J].
Gokhale, Sumita ;
Rosen, Daniel ;
Sneige, Nour ;
Diaz, Leslie K. ;
Resetkova, Erika ;
Sahin, Aysegul ;
Liu, Jinsong ;
Albarracin, Constance T. .
APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2007, 15 (04) :451-455
[8]   HER2 in well differentiated breast cancer: is testing necessary? [J].
Haines, G. Kenneth, III ;
Wiley, Elizabeth ;
Susnik, Barbara ;
Apple, Sophia K. ;
Frkovic-Grazio, Snjezana ;
Reyes, Carolina ;
Goldstein, Lynn C. ;
Dadmanesh, Farnaz ;
Gown, Allen M. ;
Nadji, Mehrdad ;
Bracko, Matej ;
Tavassoli, Fattaneh A. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 112 (03) :551-556
[9]   Evaluation of New Monoclonal Antibodies in Detection of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Her2 Protein Expression in Breast Carcinoma Cell Block Sections Using Conventional Microscopy and Quantitative Image Analysis [J].
Hanley, K. Z. ;
Siddiqui, M. T. ;
Lawson, D. ;
Cohen, C. ;
Nassar, A. .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 37 (04) :251-257
[10]   The invasive lobular carcinoma as a prototype luminal A breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study [J].
Jung, So-Youn ;
Jeong, Junsoo ;
Shin, Seung-Ho ;
Kwon, Youngmee ;
Kim, Eun-A ;
Ko, Kyoung Lan ;
Shin, Kyung Hwan ;
Lee, Keun Seok ;
Park, In Hae ;
Lee, Seeyoun ;
Kim, Seok Won ;
Kang, Han-Sung ;
Ro, Jungsil .
BMC CANCER, 2010, 10