Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors: A comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt

被引:149
作者
Luo, Qiaoling [1 ]
Zhou, Junfang [1 ]
Li, Zhigang [1 ]
Yu, Bolin [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Urban Design, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem service values; Regional differences; Driving factors; STIRPAT model; Yangtze River Economic Belt; CARBON EMISSIONS; IMPACT; STIRPAT; POPULATION; POLICY; URBANIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; IMPROVEMENT; SCIENCE; FORESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138452
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the spatial distribution characteristics of ecosystem service value (ESV) and their underlying driving factors is critical for ecosystem service management. Using three national-level urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, Cheng-Yu (CY), Middle-Reach Yangtze River (MRYR), and Yangtze River Delta (YRD), as a case study, this paper quantifies the ESVs and the spatial distribution characteristics, analyzes the driving factors of ESVs using the stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence, and technology model (STIRPAT). The results specify that: (1) Over the study period 2009-2016, the total ESV of the three urban agglomerations decreases by 5498.70 million USD. The regulating, supporting, and cultural service decrease by 4607.60, 2648.01, and 1182.25 million USD, respectively, while the provisioning service increases by 2795.15 million USD. (2) ESV in MRYR undergoes the largest reduction of 4269.70 million USD, followed by CY and YRD with 1015.66 and 213.35 million USD from 2009 to 2016. (3) In 2016, among the 70 cities at the prefecture level or above, the cities with high total ESV, per unit area ESV, and per capita EVS are mainly distributed to the areas of the south Yangtze River of MRYR and YRD, MRYR, and MRYR and YRD, respectively. (4) In general, land use and cover, population are the main factors affecting ESVs, followed by economic, social and political factors. Among the three urban agglomerations, population, land use and cover basically have the equally important impacts on ESV in CY; land use and cover, especially the proportion of urban construction land has the greatest impact on ESV in MRYR; population, especially the urbanization rate has the greatest impact in YRD. The comparative analysis of the driving factors of ESVs in different regions is helpful to propose differentiated ecological protection policies and promote the increase of ESV accordingly. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Quantifying ecosystem services and indicators for science, policy and practice
    Alkemade, Rob
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Nedkov, Stoyan
    Petz, Katalin
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 37 : 161 - 162
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
  • [3] Economic valuation of regulating services provided by wetlands in agricultural landscapes: A meta-analysis
    Brander, Luke
    Brouwer, Roy
    Wagtendonk, Alfred
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 56 : 89 - 96
  • [4] Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Crossman, Neville
    Nedkov, Stoyan
    Petz, Katalin
    Alkemade, Rob
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 4 : 1 - 3
  • [5] Allele specific expression of Dof genes responding to hormones and abiotic stresses in sugarcane
    Cai, Mingxing
    Lin, Jishan
    Li, Zeyun
    Lin, Zhicong
    Ma, Yaying
    Wang, Yibin
    Ming, Ray
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [6] Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas
    Chen, Tianqian
    Feng, Zhe
    Zhao, Huafu
    Wu, Kening
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 711
  • [7] Land use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic Tupu method
    Chen, Wanxu
    Zhao, Hongbo
    Li, Jiangfeng
    Zhu, Lijun
    Wang, Zheye
    Zeng, Jie
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 701
  • [8] Cheng L., 2009, RES SOILWATER CONSER, V16
  • [9] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [10] Changes in the global value of ecosystem services
    Costanza, Robert
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Sutton, Paul
    van der Ploeg, Sander
    Anderson, Sharolyn J.
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    Farber, Stephen
    Turner, R. Kerry
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 26 : 152 - 158