Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors: A comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt

被引:148
|
作者
Luo, Qiaoling [1 ]
Zhou, Junfang [1 ]
Li, Zhigang [1 ]
Yu, Bolin [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Urban Design, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem service values; Regional differences; Driving factors; STIRPAT model; Yangtze River Economic Belt; CARBON EMISSIONS; IMPACT; STIRPAT; POPULATION; POLICY; URBANIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; IMPROVEMENT; SCIENCE; FORESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138452
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the spatial distribution characteristics of ecosystem service value (ESV) and their underlying driving factors is critical for ecosystem service management. Using three national-level urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, Cheng-Yu (CY), Middle-Reach Yangtze River (MRYR), and Yangtze River Delta (YRD), as a case study, this paper quantifies the ESVs and the spatial distribution characteristics, analyzes the driving factors of ESVs using the stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence, and technology model (STIRPAT). The results specify that: (1) Over the study period 2009-2016, the total ESV of the three urban agglomerations decreases by 5498.70 million USD. The regulating, supporting, and cultural service decrease by 4607.60, 2648.01, and 1182.25 million USD, respectively, while the provisioning service increases by 2795.15 million USD. (2) ESV in MRYR undergoes the largest reduction of 4269.70 million USD, followed by CY and YRD with 1015.66 and 213.35 million USD from 2009 to 2016. (3) In 2016, among the 70 cities at the prefecture level or above, the cities with high total ESV, per unit area ESV, and per capita EVS are mainly distributed to the areas of the south Yangtze River of MRYR and YRD, MRYR, and MRYR and YRD, respectively. (4) In general, land use and cover, population are the main factors affecting ESVs, followed by economic, social and political factors. Among the three urban agglomerations, population, land use and cover basically have the equally important impacts on ESV in CY; land use and cover, especially the proportion of urban construction land has the greatest impact on ESV in MRYR; population, especially the urbanization rate has the greatest impact in YRD. The comparative analysis of the driving factors of ESVs in different regions is helpful to propose differentiated ecological protection policies and promote the increase of ESV accordingly. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the interrelations and driving factors among typical ecosystem services in the Yangtze river economic Belt, China
    He, Liujie
    Xie, Zeyang
    Wu, Hanqing
    Liu, Zhong
    Zheng, Bofu
    Wan, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 351
  • [2] Ecosystem Services and Their Driving Forces in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China
    Chen, Wanxu
    Chi, Guangqing
    Li, Jiangfeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (10)
  • [3] Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and driving factors of PM2.5 reduction efficiency: An empirical analysis of three urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Wang, Ke-Liang
    Xu, Ru-Yu
    Zhang, Fu-Qin
    Miao, Zhuang
    Peng, Gang
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 132
  • [4] The spatial integration and coordinated industrial development of urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Liu, Yaolin
    Zhang, Xianghui
    Pan, Xingyu
    Ma, Xiuxin
    Tang, Mingyang
    CITIES, 2020, 104
  • [5] Impact of Urban Land Expansion Efficiency on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Three Major Urban Agglomerations along the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Wang, Kun
    Ouyang, Xiao
    He, Qingyun
    Zhu, Xiang
    LAND, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [6] Exploring the Response of Ecosystem Services to Socioecological Factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Fang, Fengman
    Yao, Youru
    Ji, Qing
    Cheng, Xiaojing
    LAND, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [7] Integrating Spatial-Temporal Heterogeneity and Driving Mechanisms of Ecosystem Services Into Spatial Management Across Urban Hierarchies: A Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Luo, Qiaoling
    Zhou, Junfang
    Liu, Mingxing
    Huang, Rongjun
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2025,
  • [8] Temporal Changes and Spatial Driving Mechanisms of Water Ecological Footprints in the Context of Urbanization: Taking Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt as an Example
    Zhang, Xiuzhi
    Zhang, Daoyang
    Yiwen, Zhang
    WATER, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [9] The spatial spillover effects of ecosystem services: A case study in Yangtze River economic belt in China
    Qu, Hongjiao
    You, Chang
    Feng, Chen-Chieh
    Guo, Luo
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 168
  • [10] Constraint relationship of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Zihui Li
    Dongjie Guan
    Lilei Zhou
    Yanjun Zhang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 12484 - 12505