Minimally Invasive Port Access Approach for Reoperations on the Mitral Valve

被引:20
作者
Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
Wallen, Tyler
Pulsipher, Aaron
Pitkin, Emil
Solometo, Lauren P.
Musthaq, Shenara
Fox, Jeanne
Acker, Michael
Hargrove, W. Clark, III
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Div Cardiac Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
RIGHT THORACOTOMY; SURGERY; STERNOTOMY; REPLACEMENT; HYPOTHERMIA; EXPERIENCE; OPERATION; RISK; CABG;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. In patients requiring a second-time or more operation on the mitral valve (MV), we assessed whether the outcomes of the minimally invasive port access approach (port access group) were equivalent to those of the traditional redo sternotomy approach (redo sternotomy group). Methods. In a retrospective review (1998-2011), 409 patients had previous MV operations requiring a second-time or more MV reintervention. Of those, 67 patients had the port access approach, and 342 had the redo sternotomy approach. Of the latter, 220 met the inclusion criteria because emergencies, patients with endocarditis, and those requiring concomitant procedures involving aortic valve and aorta were excluded. Results. New York Heart Association class 2 or above, age, atrial fibrillation, and surgical indications were similar in both groups. The port access group had more patients with previous MV repair (78% [n = 52] vs 41% [n = 90], p < 0.01) than with MV replacement (19% [n =13) vs 53% [n = 116], p < 0.01). Concomitant procedures were similar (20% [n = 14] vs 27% [n = 59], p = 0.4). The MV re-repair rates were similar (19% [n = 10] vs 22% [n [20], p = 1). The cardiopulmonary bypass times (153 +/- 42 minutes vs 172 +/- 83 minutes, p = 0.07) and aortic cross-clamping times (104 +/- 38 minutes versus 130 +/- 71 minutes, p < 0.01) were lower in the port access group. Mortality was lower in the port access group, although not significantly (3.0% [n = 2] vs 6.0% [n = 13], p = 0.5). The rates of postoperative stroke were similar (3.0% [n [ 2] vs 3.2% [n = 7], p = 1). On postoperative echocardiography, freedom from mitral regurgitation >2+ was 100% in the port access group and 99% in the redo sternotomy group. The mean hospital length of stay was 11 +/- 15 days versus 14 +/- 12 days (p = 0.07). Conclusions. The port access approach can be safely adopted for reoperations on the MV without compromising postoperative mortality or MV function. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Minimally invasive redo mitral valve surgery without aortic crossclamp [J].
Milani, Rodrigo ;
Slud Brofman, Paulo Roberto ;
Oliveira, Sergio ;
Patrial Neto, Luiz ;
Rosa, Matheus ;
Lima, Victor Hugo ;
Binder, Luis Fernando ;
Sanches, Aline .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2013, 28 (03) :325-330
[42]   Minimally invasive mitral valve repair for degenerative etiology: a comparative study [J].
Fouly, Mohamed Abdel Hafez ;
Mousa, Tarek K. .
CARDIOTHORACIC SURGEON, 2021, 29 (01)
[43]   Minimally invasive mitral valve repair or replacement for degenerative mitral regurgitation [J].
Hata, Masatoshi ;
Zittermann, Armin ;
Hakim-Meibodi, Kavous ;
Boergermann, Jochen ;
Gummert, Jan .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 28 (04) :575-580
[44]   Minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction: Is it an "all-comers" procedure? [J].
Speziale, Giuseppe ;
Santarpino, Giuseppe ;
Moscarelli, Marco ;
Di Bari, Nicola ;
Fiore, Flavio ;
Condello, Ignazio ;
Bartolomucci, Francesco ;
Bellino, Maria C. ;
Nasso, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (10) :2958-2962
[45]   Mitral prosthetic size predictor in minimally invasive mitral valve replacement [J].
Vo, Anh T. ;
Nguyen, Nguyen T. H. ;
Le, Khoi M. ;
Vuong, Nguyen L. ;
Nguyen, Trang T. T. ;
Vu, Thanh T. ;
Hoang, Sy, V ;
Nguyen, Dinh H. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 15 (01)
[46]   Rate of repair in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery [J].
Perier, Patrick ;
Hohenberger, Wolfgang ;
Lakew, Fitsum ;
Batz, Gerhard ;
Diegeler, Anno .
ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 2 (06) :751-757
[47]   The role of robotic technology in minimally invasive surgery for mitral valve disease [J].
Bonatti, Johannes ;
Kiaii, Bob ;
Alhan, Cem ;
Cerny, Stepan ;
Torregrossa, Gianluca ;
Bisleri, Gianluigi ;
Komlo, Caroline ;
Guy, T. Sloane .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2021, 18 (10) :955-970
[48]   Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a review of the literature [J].
Chin S. .
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016, 32 (2) :126-132
[49]   A Technical Review of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacements [J].
Preston-Maher, Georgia L. ;
Torii, Ryo ;
Burriesci, Gaetano .
CARDIOVASCULAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 6 (02) :174-184
[50]   Minimally Invasive Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement [J].
Joshi, Pragnesh ;
Doshi, Chirag ;
Vinchurkar, Mahesh ;
Thosani, Rajesh ;
Sagar, Prashant ;
Mahajan, Vijay .
HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2011, 20 (04) :231-233