Minimally Invasive Port Access Approach for Reoperations on the Mitral Valve

被引:19
作者
Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
Wallen, Tyler
Pulsipher, Aaron
Pitkin, Emil
Solometo, Lauren P.
Musthaq, Shenara
Fox, Jeanne
Acker, Michael
Hargrove, W. Clark, III
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Div Cardiac Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
RIGHT THORACOTOMY; SURGERY; STERNOTOMY; REPLACEMENT; HYPOTHERMIA; EXPERIENCE; OPERATION; RISK; CABG;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. In patients requiring a second-time or more operation on the mitral valve (MV), we assessed whether the outcomes of the minimally invasive port access approach (port access group) were equivalent to those of the traditional redo sternotomy approach (redo sternotomy group). Methods. In a retrospective review (1998-2011), 409 patients had previous MV operations requiring a second-time or more MV reintervention. Of those, 67 patients had the port access approach, and 342 had the redo sternotomy approach. Of the latter, 220 met the inclusion criteria because emergencies, patients with endocarditis, and those requiring concomitant procedures involving aortic valve and aorta were excluded. Results. New York Heart Association class 2 or above, age, atrial fibrillation, and surgical indications were similar in both groups. The port access group had more patients with previous MV repair (78% [n = 52] vs 41% [n = 90], p < 0.01) than with MV replacement (19% [n =13) vs 53% [n = 116], p < 0.01). Concomitant procedures were similar (20% [n = 14] vs 27% [n = 59], p = 0.4). The MV re-repair rates were similar (19% [n = 10] vs 22% [n [20], p = 1). The cardiopulmonary bypass times (153 +/- 42 minutes vs 172 +/- 83 minutes, p = 0.07) and aortic cross-clamping times (104 +/- 38 minutes versus 130 +/- 71 minutes, p < 0.01) were lower in the port access group. Mortality was lower in the port access group, although not significantly (3.0% [n = 2] vs 6.0% [n = 13], p = 0.5). The rates of postoperative stroke were similar (3.0% [n [ 2] vs 3.2% [n = 7], p = 1). On postoperative echocardiography, freedom from mitral regurgitation >2+ was 100% in the port access group and 99% in the redo sternotomy group. The mean hospital length of stay was 11 +/- 15 days versus 14 +/- 12 days (p = 0.07). Conclusions. The port access approach can be safely adopted for reoperations on the MV without compromising postoperative mortality or MV function. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-specific access planning in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery
    Di Perna, Dario
    Castro, Miguel
    Gasc, Yannig
    Haigron, Pascal
    Verhoye, Jean-Philippe
    Anselmi, Amedeo
    MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2020, 136
  • [22] Should complex mitral valve repair be routinely performed using a minimally invasive approach?
    Anyanwu, Anelechi C.
    Adams, David H.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 27 (02) : 118 - 124
  • [23] Pilot study of totally thoracoscopic periareolar approach for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Towards even less invasive?
    Maruszewski, Marcin
    Smoczynski, Radoslaw
    Kowalewski, Mariusz
    Bartczak, Maciej
    Witkowska, Anna
    Staromlynski, Jakub
    Drobinski, Dominik
    Kujawski, Mariusz
    Suwalski, Piotr
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2019, 14 (02) : 326 - 332
  • [24] Quality of mitral valve repair: Median sternotomy versus port-access approach
    Raanani, Ehud
    Spiegelstein, Dan
    Sternik, Leonid
    Preisman, Sergey
    Moshkovitz, Yaron
    Smolinsky, Aram K.
    Shinfeld, Amihai
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 140 (01) : 86 - 90
  • [25] Mitral valve repair after a right pneumonectomy: a minimally invasive approach
    Rose, David
    Liew, Chee K.
    Zacharias, Joseph
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 21 (04) : 551 - 553
  • [26] Evolution of operative techniques and perfusion strategies for minimally invasive mitral valve repair
    Grossi, Eugene A.
    Loulmet, Didier F.
    Schwartz, Charles F.
    Ursomanno, Patricia
    Zias, Elias A.
    Dellis, Sophia L.
    Galloway, Aubrey C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 143 (04) : S68 - S70
  • [27] Mitral insufficiency: minimally invasive valve surgery
    Schibilsky, D.
    Schlensak, C.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2011, 136 (39) : 1965 - 1965
  • [28] Minimally invasive robotic mitral valve surgery
    Atluri, Pavan
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2011, 8 (01) : 115 - 120
  • [29] Minimally Invasive Heart and Mitral Valve Surgery
    Kamler, Markus
    Wendt, Daniel
    Pul, Uensal
    Thielmann, Matthias
    Buck, Thomas
    Kottenberg, Eva
    Erbel, Raimund
    Jakob, Heinz
    HERZ, 2009, 34 (06) : 436 - 442
  • [30] Decision Making during the Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Focused Review for the Starting Minimally Invasive Surgeon
    Ko, Kinsing
    Verhagen, Ad F. T. M.
    de Kroon, Thom L.
    Morshuis, Wim J.
    van Garsse, Leen A. F. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (20)