Rasch Analysis of the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale

被引:39
作者
Klein, Penelope J. [1 ]
Fiedler, Roger C.
Rose, Debra J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] DYouville Coll, Phys Therapy Dept, Buffalo, NY 14201 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Div Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
[3] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Ctr Successful Aging, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
关键词
aged; balance; fall risk assessment tool; falls; psychometrics; FAB Scale; OLDER-ADULTS; FALLS;
D O I
10.3138/ptc.2009-51
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: This cross-sectional study explores the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale, a multi-item balance test for higher-functioning older adults. Methods: Participants (n = 480) were community-dwelling adults able to ambulate independently. Data gathering consisted of survey and balance performance assessment. Psychometric properties were assessed using Rasch analysis. Results: Mean age of participants was 76.4 (SD = 7.1) years. Mean FAB Scale scores were 24.7/40 (SD = 7.5). Analyses for scale dimensionality showed that 9 of the 10 items fit a unidimensional measure of balance. Item 10 (Reactive Postural Control) did not fit the model. The reliability of the scale to separate persons was 0.81 out of 1.00; the reliability of the scale to separate items in terms of their difficulty was 0.99 out of 1.00. Cronbach's alpha for a 10-item model was 0.805. Items of differing difficulties formed a useful ordinal hierarchy for scaling patterns of expected balance ability scoring for a normative population. Conclusion: The FAB Scale appears to be a reliable and valid tool to assess balance function in higher-functioning older adults. The test was found to discriminate among participants of varying balance abilities. Further exploration of concurrent validity of Rasch-generated expected item scoring patterns should be undertaken to determine the test's diagnostic and prescriptive utility.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 125
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Measurement essentials
[2]  
BERG KO, 1992, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V83, pS7
[3]   Use of clinical and, impairment-based tests to predict falls by community-dwelling older adults [J].
Boulgarides, LK ;
McGinty, SM ;
Willett, JA ;
Barnes, CW .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2003, 83 (04) :328-339
[4]   Use of item response analysis to investigate measurement properties and clinical validity of data for the Dynamic Gait Index [J].
Chiu, Yi-Po ;
Fritz, Stacy L. ;
Light, Kathye E. ;
Velozo, Craig A. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 86 (06) :778-787
[5]   Predicting Which Older Adults Will or Will Not Fall Using the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale [J].
Hernandez, Danielle ;
Rose, Debra J. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (12) :2309-2315
[6]  
*HLTH CAN PUBL HLT, 2006, SEN AG PREV FALL YOU
[7]  
Linacre J.M., 1996, RASCH MEASUREMENT T, V9, P455
[8]   THE TIMED UP AND GO - A TEST OF BASIC FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY FOR FRAIL ELDERLY PERSONS [J].
PODSIADLO, D ;
RICHARDSON, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1991, 39 (02) :142-148
[9]  
Ramey D R, 1992, Arthritis Care Res, V5, P119, DOI 10.1002/art.1790050303
[10]  
Rose D.J., 2003, FALLPROOF COMPREHENS