Towards a Global Framework for Analysing the Forest-Based Bioeconomy

被引:11
作者
Piplani, Meenakshi [1 ]
Smith-Hall, Carsten [2 ]
机构
[1] Preferred Nat, Dept Strategy & Innovat, Skindergade 23,3th, DK-1159 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
关键词
Finland; forests; Nepal; non-timber forest products; schools; sustainable development; timber; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; SUSTAINABILITY; BIODIVERSITY; GREEN; ERA;
D O I
10.3390/f12121673
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The bioeconomy approach offers potential solutions to global challenges, including sustainable forest management. The body of literature on the forest-based bioeconomy is rapidly expanding, and the diversity of approaches is bewildering. In this paper, we (1) discuss and clarify terminology related to the forest-based bioeconomy as a basis for (2) developing a general framework for analysing the forest-based bioeconomy, which is then (3) applied to two bioeconomy cases. The point of departure is a structured literature review; through qualitative content analysis, we identified the key questions characterizing current approaches to the forest-based bioeconomy; subsequently, the two cases were investigated through analysis of nominal and functional national bioeconomy policy documents and case-specific literature. Answering the key questions allowed the identification of five distinct schools of thought that make up the global framework: the biotechnology, techno-bioresource, socio-bioresource, eco-efficiency, and eco-society schools. These provide a systematic tool to analyse key paradigms, public policy goals, product or service sold, stakeholders, strength of environmental sustainability, and likely transition pathways. We illustrate the application of the framework through analysis of two cases (medicinal plants in Nepal and timber in Finland). We end by discussing how to operationalize the framework further.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GLOBAL FOREST RESOUR, DOI DOI 10.4060/CA8753EN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NACE rev. 2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Forest Finance Working Paper FSFM/ACC/09
[4]  
Arts B., 2010, DISCOURSES ACTORS IN, P57
[5]   The Green Economy Post Rio+20 [J].
Barbier, Edward B. .
SCIENCE, 2012, 338 (6109) :887-888
[6]   Sustainable Development Goals and the Forest SectorA Complex Relationship [J].
Baumgartner, Rupert J. .
FORESTS, 2019, 10 (02)
[7]  
Birner R., 2018, Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, P17, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_3, 10.1007/978-3-319-68152-83, 10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_3]
[8]   Reviewing natural resources law in the light of bioeconomy: Finnish forest regulations as a case study [J].
Borgstrom, Suvi .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2018, 88 :11-23
[9]   What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature [J].
Bugge, Markus M. ;
Hansen, Teis ;
Klitkou, Antje .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (07)
[10]   Plant-Based Sustainable Development-The Expansion and Anatomy of the Medicinal Plant Secondary Processing Sector in Nepal [J].
Caporale, Filippo ;
Mateo-Martin, Jimena ;
Usman, Muhammad Faizan ;
Smith-Hall, Carsten .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)