Classification characteristics of the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 for screening somatoform disorders in a primary care setting

被引:104
作者
Koerber, Stephanie [1 ]
Frieser, Dirk [1 ]
Steinbrecher, Natalie [1 ]
Hiller, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Clin Psychol, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
关键词
Screening; Medically unexplained symptoms; Somatoform disorders; Primary care; MEDICALLY UNEXPLAINED SYMPTOMS; DIAGNOSING MENTAL-DISORDERS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PHYSICAL SYMPTOMS; SOMATIC SYMPTOMS; GENERAL-PRACTICE; MULTISOMATOFORM DISORDER; PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS; VALIDITY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.01.006
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: This study examines how effectively the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), a self-administered screening instrument, recognizes somatoform symptoms and somatoform disorders in a German primary care setting. Methods: A selected sample of 308 patients (mean age 47.2 years, 71.4% women) from two regular primary care practices was screened with the PHQ-15 and additionally examined with structured interviews. Their primary care physicians rated symptoms reported in the interview as either "medically explained" or "medically unexplained". Results: Seventy-six percent of the symptoms were judged as medically unexplained. The PHQ-15 correlated significantly with the total number of symptoms as well as the number of somatoform symptoms (both r=0.63; P <= 0.01). A comparison between the most frequently reported symptoms in the interview and the 15 items of the PHQ-15 revealed that even though the PHQ-15 does not differentiate between medically explained and medically unexplained symptoms, it does catch many somatoform symptoms. When used to predict the diagnosis of a somatoform disorder, a cutoff of 10 points in the PHQ-15 was identified as optimal, resulting in a sensitivity of 80.2% and specificity of 58.5%. However, the cutoff has to be adjusted according to specific research or clinical purposes. Conclusion: Several previous results could be confirmed, and under consideration of some limitations, the PHQ-15 seems to be a valuable tool for identifying somatoform symptoms and disorders in primary care. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 147
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The diagnostic challenges presented by patients with medically unexplained symptoms in general practice [J].
Aiarzaguena, Jose M. ;
Grandes, Gonzalo ;
Salazar, Agustin ;
Gaminde, Idoia ;
Sanchez, Alvaro .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2008, 26 (02) :99-105
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, DSM 5 DEV COMPL SOM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[4]   Somatoform disorder in primary care: Course and the need for cognitive-behavioral treatment [J].
Arnold, Ingrid A. ;
de Waal, Margot W. M. ;
Eekhof, Just A. H. ;
van Hemert, Albert M. .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2006, 47 (06) :498-503
[5]   Screening for somatization and depression in Saudi Arabia: A validation study of the PHQ in primary care [J].
Becker, S ;
Al Zaid, K ;
Al Faris, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (03) :271-283
[6]   Cognitive-behavioural therapy for patients with multiple somatoform symptoms - a randomised controlled trial in tertiary care [J].
Bleichhardt, G ;
Timmer, B ;
Rief, W .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2004, 56 (04) :449-454
[7]  
Buhner M., 2009, Statistik fur Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler
[8]  
Cherry Donald K, 2007, Adv Data, P1
[9]   The role of comorbidity in the detection of psychiatric disorders with checklists for mental and physical symptoms in primary care [J].
de Waal, Margot W. M. ;
Arnold, Ingrid A. ;
Spinhoven, Philip ;
Eekhof, Just A. H. ;
Assendelft, Willem J. J. ;
van Hemert, Albert M. .
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 44 (01) :78-85
[10]   Somatoform disorders in general practice - Prevalence, functional impairment and comorbidity with anxiety and depressive disorders [J].
De Waal, MWM ;
Arnold, IA ;
Eekhof, JAH ;
Van Hemert, AM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 184 :470-476