Thermal performance analysis of large-scale flat plate solar collectors and regional applicability in China

被引:33
|
作者
Wang, Dengjia [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Zhelong [2 ]
Liu, Yanfeng [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Yuchao [2 ]
Fan, Jianhua [3 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, State Key Lab Green Bldg Western China, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Bldg Serv Sci & Engn, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Civil Engn, Brovej 118Kgs, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flat plate solar collector; Solar collector size; Thermal performance; Regional applicability; FLOW DISTRIBUTION; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; VALIDATION; SIMULATION; PANEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.121931
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The thermal performance of flat-plate solar collectors (FPSCs) depends not only on environmental and operational parameters but also on its dimensions. In this study, the thermal performance improvement mechanism of FPSCs is studied focusing on the impact of collector size. Numerical simulation models for both large-scale flat-plate solar collectors (LSFPSCs), and conventional FPSCs in parallel, are introduced. The relationship between thermal performance and collector dimensions is studied for the LSFPSCs. Furthermore, the effect of the environmental and operational parameters on the thermal performance of the two collector types is investigated. Moreover, the applicability of LSFPSCs in China is analyzed with respect to available operating times, useful energy, and heat loss. The results indicate that increasing the collector dimensions can improve the thermal performance of FPSCs effectively, and the LSFPSCs perform better than conventional FPSCs in parallel. Compared to the conventional FPSCs, the collector efficiency of the LSFPSCs is higher-especially for low solar irradiance, low ambient temperatures, and high mass flow rates. In addition, the LSFPSCs excel in solar-energy rich areas, the available daily operating time in Lhasa is 9.6 h, which is the longest operating time among the studied cities, and the proportion of useful energy is about 55 %. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THERMAL PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR HIGH-TEMPERATURE FLAT-PLATE SOLAR COLLECTORS
    SYMONS, JG
    GANI, R
    SOLAR ENERGY, 1980, 24 (04) : 407 - 410
  • [22] Numerically assisted analysis of flat and corrugated plate solar collectors thermal performances
    Dovic, Damir
    Andrassy, Mladen
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2012, 86 (09) : 2416 - 2431
  • [23] Thermal and mechanical performance of sealed, gas-filled, flat plate solar collectors
    Vestlund, Johan
    Dalenback, Jan-Olof
    Ronnelid, Mats
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2012, 86 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [24] Thermal performance testing of flat-plate collectors
    Rojas, D.
    Beermann, J.
    Klein, S. A.
    Reindl, D. T.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2008, 82 (08) : 746 - 757
  • [25] Thermal performance enhancement of gas filled double glazed flat plate solar collectors
    Yahyazadeh, H.
    Gorji, M.
    CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 59
  • [26] Test Method to Measure Thermal Performance of Flat-plate Solar Collectors.
    Salvador, Franco
    Termotecnica Milano, 1979, 33 (08): : 464 - 472
  • [27] Experimental Performance Analysis of Flat Plate Solar Collectors Using Different Nanofluids
    Arikan, Erdogan
    Abbasoglu, Serkan
    Gazi, Mustafa
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06):
  • [28] Dynamic thermal models and CFD analysis for flat-plate thermal solar collectors - A review
    Tagliafico, Luca A.
    Scarpa, Federico
    De Rosa, Mattia
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 30 : 526 - 537
  • [29] Small-Scale Flat Plate Collectors for Solar Thermal Scavenging in Low Conductivity Environments
    Ogbonnaya, Emmanuel
    Weiss, Leland
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHOTOENERGY, 2017, 2017
  • [30] Experimental analysis of thermal performance of flat plate and evacuated tube solar collectors in stationary standard and daily conditions
    Zambolin, E.
    Del Col, D.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2010, 84 (08) : 1382 - 1396