A ustable suburethral sling (Male remeex system®) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence:: A multicentric European study

被引:118
作者
Sousa-Escandon, Alejandro [1 ]
Cabrera, Javier
Mantovani, Franco
Moretti, Marco
Ioanidis, Euanyelos
Kondelidis, Nikolaos
Neymeyer, Joerg
Noguera, Rui
机构
[1] Hosp Comarcal Monforte, Urol Serv, Lugo 27400, Spain
[2] Fdn Jimenez Diaz, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Policlin Majore Hosp, Milan, Italy
[4] Azienda Osped, Genoa, Italy
[5] Papageorgiou Hosp, Thessaloniki, Greece
[6] San Franciscus Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
[7] Hosp Clin, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
male incontinence; stress urinary incontinence; adjustable; suburethral sling;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a readjustable sling for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Materials and methods: Between October 2002 and August 2005, 51 male patients with mild to severe SUI were prospectively operated with the use of a readjustable sling (MRS (R)) at seven different European hospitals: Spain (2), Italy (2), Greece (1), Germany (1), and Portugal (1). The origin of incontinence was radical prostatectomy in 43 cases, TUR in 4, and open prostatectomy in another 4. Duration of incontinence ranged from 1 to 10 yr with an average of 3.5 yr. Results: All patients but 5 were regulated during the early postoperative period; 44 patients (including all S not regulated during the early period) required a second regulation under local anaesthesia between 1 to 4 mo after surgery, and 17 other patients required more than one delayed regulation. After that, 33 patients (64.7%) were considered cured (25 of them wore no pads at all, and 8 used small pads or sanitary napkins for security but normally remained dry); another 10 cases showed important improvement (19.6%); and only 8 patients remain unchanged (15.7%). The average follow-up time was 32 mo (range: 16-50). The mesh was removed in 1 case owing to urethral erosion and the varitensor in 2 cases owing to infection. There were five (9.8%) uneventful intraoperative bladder perforations at the postoperative period, and there were three mild perineal haematomas (5.9%). Most patients felt perineal discomfort or pain, which was easily treated with oral medications. Conclusions: The MRS (R) allowed postoperative readjustment of the suburethral sling pressure at the immediate or midterm postoperative period, which allowed the achievement of good midterm results in almost 85% of patients without significant postoperative complications. (c) 2007 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1473 / 1480
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ABRAMS P, 2 INT CONS CONT 2002
[2]  
BRUSCHINI H, INT CONT SOC C 2004
[3]   Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: Considerations and evidence [J].
Cambio, Angelo J. ;
Evans, Christopher P. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (05) :903-913
[4]  
Cerqueira M, 2005, Actas Urol Esp, V29, P401
[5]  
Cespedes R D, 2001, Tech Urol, V7, P176
[6]   Polypropylene mesh tape for male sphincteric incontinence [J].
Cetinel, B ;
Demirkesen, O ;
Kural, AR ;
Onal, B ;
Alan, C .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2004, 38 (05) :396-400
[7]   The male perineal sling: Intermediate-term results [J].
Comiter, CV .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2005, 24 (07) :648-653
[8]   The male perineal sling: Comparison of sling materials [J].
Dikranian, AH ;
Chang, JH ;
Rhee, EY ;
Aboseif, SR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (02) :608-610
[9]  
Fassi-Fehri H, 2004, PROG UROL, V14, P1171
[10]   Efficacy of the InVanc™ male sling in men with stress urinary incontinence [J].
Fassi-Fehri, Hakim ;
Badet, Lionel ;
Cherass, Arnaud ;
Murat, Francois-Joseph ;
Colombel, Marc ;
Martin, Xavier ;
Gelet, Albert .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (02) :498-503