Efficacy and cognitive effect of sarcosine (N-methylglycine) in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials

被引:30
作者
Chang, Chun-Hung [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lin, Chieh-Hsin [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Liu, Chieh-Yu [7 ]
Chen, Shaw-Ji [8 ,9 ]
Lane, Hsien-Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,10 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Inst Clin Med Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat, 2 Yuh Der Rd, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[3] China Med Univ Hosp, Brain Dis Res Ctr, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ, An Nan Hosp, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, Grad Inst Biomed Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taipei Univ Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Speech Language Pathol & Audiol, Biostat Consulting Lab, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Mackay Mem Hosp, Taitung Branch, Dept Psychiat, Taitung, Taiwan
[9] Mackay Med Coll, Dept Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
[10] Asia Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Psychol, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Sarcosine; N-methylglycine; type 1 glycine transporter inhibitor (GlyT1); schizophrenia; METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; ADD-ON TREATMENT; RECEPTOR-MEDIATED NEUROTRANSMISSION; TRANSPORTER-I INHIBITOR; ANTIPSYCHOTIC TREATMENT; SPECTROSCOPY PARAMETERS; TREATMENT AUGMENTATION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SERUM-LEVELS; CLOZAPINE;
D O I
10.1177/0269881120908016
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Sarcosine (N-methylglycine), a type 1 glycine transporter inhibitor (GlyT1), has shown therapeutic potential for treating schizophrenia; however, studies have reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and cognitive effect of sarcosine for schizophrenia. Methods: In this study, PubMed, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials were searched electronically for double-blinded randomised controlled trials that used sarcosine for treating schizophrenia. We used the published trials up to November 2019 to investigate the efficacy of sarcosine in schizophrenia. We pooled studies by using a random-effect model for comparing sarcosine treatment effects. Patients who were diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition were recruited. Clinical improvement and cognitive function scores between baseline and after sarcosine use were compared using the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity of the included trials was evaluated through visual inspection of funnel plots and through the I-2 statistic. Results: We identified seven trials with 326 participants with schizophrenia meeting the inclusion criteria. All these studies evaluated the overall clinical symptoms, and four of them evaluated overall cognitive functions. Sarcosine use achieved more significant effects than the use of its comparators in relieving overall clinical symptoms (SMD = 0.51, CI = 0.26-0.76, p < 0.01). Moreover, studies with the low Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale range of 70-79 showed significant effect size (ES)s of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.03-1.31, p = 0.04). In addition, trials enrolling patients with stable clinical symptoms had significant ESs: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.21-0.85, p < 0.01). Add-on sarcosine combined with first- and second-generation antipsychotics, except clozapine, had a positive effect. For overall cognitive functions, sarcosine showed a positive but insignificant effect compared with its comparators (SMD = 0.27, CI = -0.06 to 0.60, p = 0.10). The effects were correlated with increased female proportions and decreased illness duration, albeit nonsignificantly. Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggests that sarcosine may be associated with treatment effect on overall clinical symptoms in patients with schizophrenia but not cognitive functions.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 505
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Amiaz R, 2015, ISR J PSYCHIATR REL, V52, P12
[2]  
ANDREASEN NC, 1982, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V39, P789
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SCI REP UK
[4]  
Arvanov VL, 1997, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V283, P226
[5]  
Arvanov VL, 1999, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V289, P1000
[6]   Colocalization of distinct NMDA receptor subtypes at excitatory synapses in the entorhinal cortex [J].
Beesley, Stephen ;
Sullenberger, Thomas ;
Pilli, Jyotsna ;
Abbasi, Saad ;
Gunjan, Akash ;
Kumar, Sanjay S. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 121 (01) :238-254
[7]   Effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor-enhancing agents on cognition in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials [J].
Chang, Chun-Hung ;
Lane, Hsien-Yuan ;
Tseng, Ping-Tao ;
Chen, Shaw-Ji ;
Liu, Chieh-Yu ;
Lin, Chieh-Hsin .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 33 (04) :436-448
[8]   Adjunctive pharmacotherapy for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: meta-analytical investigation of efficacy [J].
Choi, Kee-Hong ;
Wykes, Til ;
Kurtz, Matthew M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 203 (03) :172-178
[9]   The glutamatergic dysfunction hypothesis for schizophrenia [J].
Coyle, JT .
HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 3 (05) :241-253
[10]   Alzheimer disease [J].
Cummings, JL ;
Cole, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (18) :2335-2338