Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A prospective study

被引:6
|
作者
Navarro-Valverde, Cristina [1 ]
Ramos-Maqueda, Javier [2 ]
Jose Romero-Reyes, M. [1 ]
Esteve-Ruiz, Irene [3 ]
Garcia-Medina, Dolores [1 ]
Pavon-Jimenez, Ricardo [1 ]
Rodriguez-Gomez, Cristobal [4 ]
Leal-Del-Ojo, Juan [5 ]
Cayuela, Aurelio [6 ]
Molano-Casimiro, Francisco J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Cardiol, Seville, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Univ Lozano Blesa, Dept Cardiol, Arrhythmias Unit, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Hosp Juan Ramon Jimenez, Dept Cardiol, Huelva, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Radiol, Seville, Spain
[5] Hosp Fatima, Dept Cardiol, Seville, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Publ Hlth Prevent & Hlth Promot, Seville, Spain
关键词
Pacemaker Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Magnetic resonance imaging; Safety; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; PACEMAKER; SAFETY; MRI; UTILITY; STRATEGIES; CARDIOLOGY; STATEMENT; ARTIFACT; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2022.05.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated is constantly increasing. The potential risk of electromagnetic interference has limited its use and it is still contraindicated by the Food and Drug Administration in some cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MRI in these patients. Methods: A prospective registry comprising patients with a pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD), MRI-conditional or not, who were candidates for MRI (at 1.5 T) with no suitable alternative diagnostic technique. All devices were programmed before the procedure and patients were monitored throughout the test. Clinical, electrical, and technical parameters were evaluated before and after MRI. Results: 147 MRI examinations (132 PM and 15 ICD) were performed. There were no clinical events or significant differences in the electrical parameters of the leads after MRI. A variation in the impedance of the ventricular leads was detected, although the difference was not clinically relevant. In one patient with a PM, a failure in release of the safety impulse was detected in the auto-threshold test, although the threshold was correctly determined. In 11 of the 17 thoracic MRIs, image artifacts were detected, preventing the diagnosis in two of them. Conclusions: In patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, MRIs performed under a specific protocol has been shown to be safe in the short term even in the thoracic region, as well as interpretable in most cases.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices: It's Not What We Can Do, It's What We Should Do
    Roguin, Ariel
    Goldsher, Dorith
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 12 (07): : 436 - 438
  • [32] Provision of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with 'MR-conditional' cardiac implantable electronic devices: an unmet clinical need
    Sabzevari, Kian
    Oldman, James
    Herrey, Anna S.
    Moon, James C.
    Kydd, Anna C.
    Manisty, Charlotte
    EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (03): : 425 - 431
  • [33] Joint British Society consensus recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Bhuva, Anish
    Charles-Edwards, Geoff
    Ashmore, Jonathan
    Lipton, Alexandra
    Benbow, Matthew
    Grainger, David
    Lobban, Trudie
    Gopalan, Deepa
    Slade, Alistair
    Roditi, Giles
    Manisty, Charlotte
    HEART, 2024, 110 (04)
  • [34] Wideband myocardial perfusion pulse sequence for imaging patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device
    Hong, KyungPyo
    Collins, Jeremy D.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    Carr, James C.
    Lee, Daniel C.
    Kim, Daniel
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2019, 81 (02) : 1219 - 1228
  • [35] 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience
    Fluschnik, Nina
    Tahir, Enver
    Erley, Jennifer
    Muellerleile, Kai
    Metzner, Andreas
    Wenzel, Jan-Per
    Guerreiro, Helena
    Adam, Gerhard
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Kirchhof, Paulus
    Toennis, Tobias
    Nikorowitsch, Julius
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (02): : 571 - 577
  • [36] Impact of magnetic resonance imaging on functional integrity of non-conditional cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
    Dahiya, Garima
    Wetzel, Adam
    Kyvernitakis, Andreas
    Gevenosky, Loretta
    Williams, Ronald
    Shah, Moneal
    Farah, Victor
    Doyle, Mark
    Biederman, Robert W. W.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (08): : 1312 - 1319
  • [37] MRI in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Cronin, Edmond M.
    Mahon, Niall
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2012, 9 (02) : 139 - 146
  • [38] Is diversity harmful?—Mixed-brand cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Christoph Alexander König
    Florian Tinhofer
    Thomas Puntus
    Achim Leo Burger
    Nikolaus Neubauer
    Herbert Langenberger
    Kurt Huber
    Michael Nürnberg
    David Zweiker
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2022, 134 : 286 - 293
  • [39] MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES UNDERGOING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING - PROPOSAL FOR UNIFIED HOSPITAL PROTOCOL: CROATIAN WORKING GROUP ON ARRHYTHMIAS AND CARDIAC PACING
    Pavlovic, Nikola
    Dula, Kristijan
    Kuharic, Ivan
    Brusich, Sandro
    Velagic, Vedran
    Jurisic, Zrinka
    Bakotic, Zoran
    Anic, Ante
    Nikolic, Borka Pezo
    Radeljic, Vjekoslav
    Cubranic, Zlatko
    Zeljkovic, Ivan
    Zadravec, Dijana
    Manola, Sime
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2020, 59 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [40] Magnetic resonance Imaging of Implantable cardiac rhythm devices at 3.0 tesla
    Gimbel, J. Rod
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (07): : 795 - 801