Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A prospective study

被引:6
|
作者
Navarro-Valverde, Cristina [1 ]
Ramos-Maqueda, Javier [2 ]
Jose Romero-Reyes, M. [1 ]
Esteve-Ruiz, Irene [3 ]
Garcia-Medina, Dolores [1 ]
Pavon-Jimenez, Ricardo [1 ]
Rodriguez-Gomez, Cristobal [4 ]
Leal-Del-Ojo, Juan [5 ]
Cayuela, Aurelio [6 ]
Molano-Casimiro, Francisco J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Cardiol, Seville, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Univ Lozano Blesa, Dept Cardiol, Arrhythmias Unit, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Hosp Juan Ramon Jimenez, Dept Cardiol, Huelva, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Radiol, Seville, Spain
[5] Hosp Fatima, Dept Cardiol, Seville, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Publ Hlth Prevent & Hlth Promot, Seville, Spain
关键词
Pacemaker Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Magnetic resonance imaging; Safety; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; PACEMAKER; SAFETY; MRI; UTILITY; STRATEGIES; CARDIOLOGY; STATEMENT; ARTIFACT; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2022.05.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated is constantly increasing. The potential risk of electromagnetic interference has limited its use and it is still contraindicated by the Food and Drug Administration in some cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MRI in these patients. Methods: A prospective registry comprising patients with a pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD), MRI-conditional or not, who were candidates for MRI (at 1.5 T) with no suitable alternative diagnostic technique. All devices were programmed before the procedure and patients were monitored throughout the test. Clinical, electrical, and technical parameters were evaluated before and after MRI. Results: 147 MRI examinations (132 PM and 15 ICD) were performed. There were no clinical events or significant differences in the electrical parameters of the leads after MRI. A variation in the impedance of the ventricular leads was detected, although the difference was not clinically relevant. In one patient with a PM, a failure in release of the safety impulse was detected in the auto-threshold test, although the threshold was correctly determined. In 11 of the 17 thoracic MRIs, image artifacts were detected, preventing the diagnosis in two of them. Conclusions: In patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, MRIs performed under a specific protocol has been shown to be safe in the short term even in the thoracic region, as well as interpretable in most cases.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Challenges and Solutions
    Rajiah, Prabhakar
    Kay, Fernando
    Bolen, Michael
    Patel, Amit R.
    Landeras, Luis
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2020, 35 (01) : W1 - W17
  • [22] Beyond the AJR: "Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Abandoned Leads"
    Stojanovska, Jadranka
    Ibrahim, El-Sayed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (05) : 1247 - 1247
  • [23] Automatic consultation system for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Donghoon Han
    Ji Hyun Lee
    Il-Young Oh
    In-ho Chae
    Ho-Young Lee
    Youngjin Cho
    International Journal of Arrhythmia, 21 (1)
  • [24] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in a cardio-oncology center
    Tajstra, Mateusz
    Dyrbus, Maciej
    Wojtynek, Elzbieta
    Wojtaszczyk, Adam
    Rutkowski, Tomasz
    Niedziela, Jacek
    Blachut, Aleksandra
    Jarzab, Michal
    Blamek, Slawomir
    Kurek, Anna
    Gorol, Jaroslaw
    Witek, Mateusz
    Skladowski, Krzysztof
    Gasior, Mariusz
    Bobek-Bilewicz, Barbara
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2023, 81 (06) : 619 - 621
  • [25] Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Epicardial or Abandoned Leads
    Gakenheimer-Smith, Lindsey
    Etheridge, Susan
    Ou, Zhining
    Presson, Angela
    Whitaker, Patricia
    Su, Jason
    Puchalski, Michael
    Asaki, Sarah Y.
    Niu, Mary
    Pilcher, Thomas
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [26] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in People With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Population Based Cohort Study
    Gillam, Marianne H.
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Pratt, Nicole L.
    Shakib, Sepehr
    Roughead, Elizabeth E.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2018, 27 (06): : 748 - 751
  • [27] SAFETY OF CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING WITH NON-CONDITIONAL CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    Eyvazian, Vaughn
    Do, Duc H.
    Bayoneta, Aileen Joy
    Finn, J.
    Boyle, Noel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 429 - 429
  • [28] Joint British Society consensus recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Bhuva, Anish
    Charles-Edwards, Geoff
    Ashmore, Jonathan
    Lipton, Alexandra
    Benbow, Matthew
    Grainger, David
    Lobban, Trudie
    Gopalan, Deepa
    Slade, Alistair
    Roditi, Giles
    Manisty, Charlotte
    HEART, 2024, 110 (04)
  • [29] 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience
    Fluschnik, Nina
    Tahir, Enver
    Erley, Jennifer
    Muellerleile, Kai
    Metzner, Andreas
    Wenzel, Jan-Per
    Guerreiro, Helena
    Adam, Gerhard
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Kirchhof, Paulus
    Toennis, Tobias
    Nikorowitsch, Julius
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (02): : 571 - 577
  • [30] 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices: a single center experience
    Nikorowitsch, J.
    Tahir, E.
    Erley, J.
    Muellerleile, K.
    Metzner, A.
    Adam, G.
    Blankenberg, S.
    Kirchhof, P.
    Toennis, T.
    Fluschnik, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 482 - 482