Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A prospective study

被引:6
|
作者
Navarro-Valverde, Cristina [1 ]
Ramos-Maqueda, Javier [2 ]
Jose Romero-Reyes, M. [1 ]
Esteve-Ruiz, Irene [3 ]
Garcia-Medina, Dolores [1 ]
Pavon-Jimenez, Ricardo [1 ]
Rodriguez-Gomez, Cristobal [4 ]
Leal-Del-Ojo, Juan [5 ]
Cayuela, Aurelio [6 ]
Molano-Casimiro, Francisco J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Cardiol, Seville, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Univ Lozano Blesa, Dept Cardiol, Arrhythmias Unit, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Hosp Juan Ramon Jimenez, Dept Cardiol, Huelva, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Radiol, Seville, Spain
[5] Hosp Fatima, Dept Cardiol, Seville, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Publ Hlth Prevent & Hlth Promot, Seville, Spain
关键词
Pacemaker Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Magnetic resonance imaging; Safety; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; PACEMAKER; SAFETY; MRI; UTILITY; STRATEGIES; CARDIOLOGY; STATEMENT; ARTIFACT; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2022.05.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated is constantly increasing. The potential risk of electromagnetic interference has limited its use and it is still contraindicated by the Food and Drug Administration in some cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MRI in these patients. Methods: A prospective registry comprising patients with a pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD), MRI-conditional or not, who were candidates for MRI (at 1.5 T) with no suitable alternative diagnostic technique. All devices were programmed before the procedure and patients were monitored throughout the test. Clinical, electrical, and technical parameters were evaluated before and after MRI. Results: 147 MRI examinations (132 PM and 15 ICD) were performed. There were no clinical events or significant differences in the electrical parameters of the leads after MRI. A variation in the impedance of the ventricular leads was detected, although the difference was not clinically relevant. In one patient with a PM, a failure in release of the safety impulse was detected in the auto-threshold test, although the threshold was correctly determined. In 11 of the 17 thoracic MRIs, image artifacts were detected, preventing the diagnosis in two of them. Conclusions: In patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, MRIs performed under a specific protocol has been shown to be safe in the short term even in the thoracic region, as well as interpretable in most cases.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Safety of Cardiac and Thoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Dandamudi, Sanjay
    Collins, Jeremy D.
    Carr, James C.
    Mongkolwat, Pat
    Rahsepar, Amir A.
    Tomson, Todd T.
    Verma, Nishant
    Arora, Rishi
    Chicos, Alex B.
    Kim, Susan S.
    Lin, Albert C.
    Passman, Rod S.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (12) : 1498 - 1505
  • [2] Magnetic resonance imaging safety in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Yang, Eunice
    Suzuki, Masahito
    Nazarian, Saman
    Halperin, Henry R.
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 32 (07) : 440 - 447
  • [3] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Maass, A. H.
    Hemels, M. E. W.
    Allaart, C. P.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 26 (12) : 584 - 590
  • [4] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    A. H. Maass
    M. E. W. Hemels
    C. P. Allaart
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2018, 26 : 584 - 590
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study
    Yadava, Mrinal
    Nugent, Matthew
    Krebsbach, Angela
    Minnier, Jessica
    Jessel, Peter
    Henrikson, Charles A.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 50 (01) : 95 - 104
  • [6] Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Lanz, Hugo
    Strauss, Katharina
    Hoepler, Julia
    Kraft, Marie
    Hoffmann, Sabine
    Binzenhoefer, Leonhard
    Gade, Nils
    Roden, Daniel
    Saleh, Inas
    Kaeaeb, Stefan
    Lackermair, Korbinian
    Sadoni, Sebastian
    Hagl, Christian
    Massberg, Steffen
    Estner, Heidi
    Fichtner, Stephanie
    Luesebrink, Enzo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2024, 11 (10)
  • [7] Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Higgins, John V.
    Watson, Robert E., Jr.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Dalzell, Connie
    Acker, Nancy
    Felmlee, Joel P.
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Kapa, Suraj
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [8] Is diversity harmful?-Mixed-brand cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Koenig, Christoph Alexander
    Tinhofer, Florian
    Puntus, Thomas
    Burger, Achim Leo
    Neubauer, Nikolaus
    Langenberger, Herbert
    Huber, Kurt
    Nuernberg, Michael
    Zweiker, David
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2022, 134 (7-8) : 286 - 293
  • [9] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study
    Mrinal Yadava
    Matthew Nugent
    Angela Krebsbach
    Jessica Minnier
    Peter Jessel
    Charles A. Henrikson
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2017, 50 : 95 - 104
  • [10] Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices
    Do, Duc H.
    Eyvazian, Vaughn
    Bayoneta, Aileen J.
    Hu, Peng
    Finn, J. Paul
    Bradfield, Jason S.
    Shivkumar, Kalyanam
    Boyle, Noel G.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2018, 15 (02) : 218 - 225