Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A prospective study

被引:6
作者
Navarro-Valverde, Cristina [1 ]
Ramos-Maqueda, Javier [2 ]
Jose Romero-Reyes, M. [1 ]
Esteve-Ruiz, Irene [3 ]
Garcia-Medina, Dolores [1 ]
Pavon-Jimenez, Ricardo [1 ]
Rodriguez-Gomez, Cristobal [4 ]
Leal-Del-Ojo, Juan [5 ]
Cayuela, Aurelio [6 ]
Molano-Casimiro, Francisco J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Cardiol, Seville, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Univ Lozano Blesa, Dept Cardiol, Arrhythmias Unit, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Hosp Juan Ramon Jimenez, Dept Cardiol, Huelva, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Radiol, Seville, Spain
[5] Hosp Fatima, Dept Cardiol, Seville, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Valme, Dept Publ Hlth Prevent & Hlth Promot, Seville, Spain
关键词
Pacemaker Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Magnetic resonance imaging; Safety; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; PACEMAKER; SAFETY; MRI; UTILITY; STRATEGIES; CARDIOLOGY; STATEMENT; ARTIFACT; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2022.05.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated is constantly increasing. The potential risk of electromagnetic interference has limited its use and it is still contraindicated by the Food and Drug Administration in some cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MRI in these patients. Methods: A prospective registry comprising patients with a pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD), MRI-conditional or not, who were candidates for MRI (at 1.5 T) with no suitable alternative diagnostic technique. All devices were programmed before the procedure and patients were monitored throughout the test. Clinical, electrical, and technical parameters were evaluated before and after MRI. Results: 147 MRI examinations (132 PM and 15 ICD) were performed. There were no clinical events or significant differences in the electrical parameters of the leads after MRI. A variation in the impedance of the ventricular leads was detected, although the difference was not clinically relevant. In one patient with a PM, a failure in release of the safety impulse was detected in the auto-threshold test, although the threshold was correctly determined. In 11 of the 17 thoracic MRIs, image artifacts were detected, preventing the diagnosis in two of them. Conclusions: In patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, MRIs performed under a specific protocol has been shown to be safe in the short term even in the thoracic region, as well as interpretable in most cases.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Clinical safety of ProMRI implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems during head and lower lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla [J].
Bauer, Wolfgang Rudolf ;
Lau, Dennis H. ;
Wollmann, Christian ;
McGavigan, Andrew ;
Mansourati, Jacques ;
Reiter, Theresa ;
Froemer, Simone ;
Ladd, Mark E. ;
Quick, Harald H. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[2]   Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: a collaborative clinical approach [J].
Boilson, Barry Anthony ;
Wokhlu, Anita ;
Acker, Nancy G. ;
Felmlee, Joel P. ;
Watson, Robert E., Jr. ;
Julsrud, Paul R. ;
Friedman, Paul A. ;
Cha, Yong-Mei ;
Rea, Robert F. ;
Hayes, David L. ;
Shen, Win-Kuang .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (01) :59-67
[3]   Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T in patients with cardiac rhythm devices [J].
Buendia, Francisco ;
Cano, Oscar ;
Miguel Sanchez-Gomez, Juan ;
Igual, Begona ;
Osca, Joaquin ;
Jose Sancho-Tello, Maria ;
Olaguee, Jose ;
Salvador, Antonio .
EUROPACE, 2011, 13 (04) :533-538
[4]   Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Pacing Devices [J].
Buendia, Francisco ;
Sanchez-Gomez, Juan M. ;
Sancho-Tello, Maria J. ;
Olaguee, Jose ;
Osca, Joaquin ;
Cano, Oscar ;
Arnau, Miguel A. ;
Igual, Begona .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2010, 63 (06) :735-739
[5]   Determining the Risks of Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla for Patients With Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators [J].
Cohen, Jennifer D. ;
Costa, Heather S. ;
Russo, Robert J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 110 (11) :1631-1636
[6]   Is magnetic resonance imaging safe in cardiac pacemaker recipients? [J].
Del Ojo, JL ;
Moya, F ;
Villalba, J ;
Sanz, O ;
Pavón, R ;
Garcia, D ;
Pastor, L .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (04) :274-278
[7]   Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) [J].
Gimbel, JR ;
Kanal, E ;
Schwartz, KM ;
Wilkoff, BL .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (04) :270-273
[8]   Strategies for the safe magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker-dependent patients [J].
Gimbel, JR ;
Bailey, SM ;
Tchou, PJ ;
Ruggieri, PM ;
Wilkoff, BL .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (10) :1041-1046
[9]  
Glikson M, 2021, EUR HEART J, V42, P3427, DOI [10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364, 10.1093/europace/euab232]
[10]   Incidence and predictors of MRI scan utilization in MRI-conditional pacemaker recipients: A multicenter experience [J].
Gopinathannair, Rakesh ;
Mar, Philip L. ;
Gandhi, Gaurang ;
Leiserowitz, Amy ;
Tripuraneni, Ajay ;
Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya ;
Chen, Guanhua ;
Kreps, Eric ;
Botting, Luke ;
Copeland, Stephanie ;
Firsich, Nancy ;
Kioussopoulos, Kathy ;
Granato, Jerome E. .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (11) :1519-1525