Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review

被引:276
作者
Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna [1 ]
Gartner, Fania R. [1 ]
Stiggelbout, Anne M. [1 ]
Pieterse, Arwen H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Biomed Data Sci, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
MEDICAL ENCOUNTER; PRIMARY-CARE; PATIENT; FRAMEWORK; OPPORTUNITIES; NEEDS; TIME;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To (1) provide an up-to-date overview of shared decision making (SDM)-models, (2) give insight in the prominence of components present in SDM-models, (3) describe who is identified as responsible within the components (patient, healthcare professional, both, none), (4) show the occurrence of SDM-components over time, and (5) present an SDM-map to identify SDM-components seen as key, per healthcare setting. Design Systematic review. Eligibility criteria Peer-reviewed articles in English presenting a new or adapted model of SDM. Information sources Academic Search Premier, Cochrane, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles published up to and including September 2, 2019. Results Forty articles were included, each describing a unique SDM-model. Twelve models were generic, the others were specific to a healthcare setting. Fourteen were based on empirical data, 26 primarily on analytical thinking. Fifty-three different elements were identified and clustered into 24 components. Overall, Describe treatment options was the most prominent component across models. Components present in >50% of models were: Make the decision (75%), Patient preferences (65%), Tailor information (65%), Deliberate (58%), Create choice awareness (55%), and Learn about the patient (53%). In the majority of the models (27/40), both healthcare professional and patient were identified as actors. Over time, Describe treatment options and Make the decision are the two components which are present in most models in any time period. Create choice awareness stood out for being present in a markedly larger proportion of models over time. Conclusions This review provides an up-to-date overview of SDM-models, showing that SDM-models quite consistently share some components but that a unified view on what SDM is, is still lacking. Clarity about what SDM constitutes is essential though for implementation, assessment, and research purposes. A map is offered to identify SDM-components seen as key.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Durand, Marie Anne
    Song, Julia
    Aarts, Johanna
    Barr, Paul J.
    Berger, Zackary
    Cochran, Nan
    Frosch, Dominick
    Galasinski, Dariusz
    Gulbrandsen, Pal
    Han, Paul K. J.
    Haerter, Martin
    Kinnersley, Paul
    Lloyd, Amy
    Mishra, Manish
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Tomori, Kounosuke
    Trevena, Lyndal
    Witteman, Holly O.
    Van der Weijden, Trudy
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 359
  • [2] [Anonymous], BMJ BRIT MED J
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, The BMJ, V342
  • [4] [Anonymous], CROSSING QUALITY CHA
  • [5] Patient-centered decision-making
    Beach, Mary Catherine
    Callon, Wynne
    Boss, Emily
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [6] Shared decision making in oncology: A model based on patients', health care professionals', and researchers' views
    Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
    Fischer, Maarten J.
    van Duijn-Bakker, Nanny
    Baas-Thijssen, Monique C.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (01) : 139 - 146
  • [7] Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)
    Charles, C
    Gafni, A
    Whelan, T
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) : 681 - 692
  • [8] Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model
    Charles, C
    Gafni, A
    Whelan, T
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) : 651 - 661
  • [9] Shared Decision-Making Framework for Pelvic Examinations in Asymptomatic, Nonpregnant Patients
    Chor, Julie
    Stulberg, Debra B.
    Tillman, Stephanie
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 (04) : 810 - 814
  • [10] A patient in the clinic; a person in the world. Why shared decision making needs to center on the person rather than the medical encounter
    Clayman, Marla L.
    Gulbrandsen, Pal
    Morris, Megan A.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (03) : 600 - 604