Evolution of the the ART approach: highlights and achievements

被引:22
作者
Frencken, Jo E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Global Oral Hlth, Coll Dent Sci, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART); Developing countries; Dental caries; Health services research; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; PERMANENT DENTITION; PRIMARY TEETH; SURVIVAL; CHILDREN; PAIN; METAANALYSIS; COMPOSITE; SEALANTS; CARIES;
D O I
10.1590/S1678-77572009000700014
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
A traumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) was initiated in the mid-eighties in Tanzania in response to an inappropriately functioning community oral health programme that was based on western health care models and western technology. The approach has evolved to its present standing as an effective minimal intervention approach mainly because the originators anticipated the great potential of ART to alleviate inequality in oral health care, and because they recognised the need to carry out research to investigate its effectiveness and applicability. Twenty-five years later, ART was accepted by the World Health Organisation (1994) and the FDI World Dental Federation (2002). It is included in textbooks on cariology, restorative dentistry and minimal intervention dentistry. It is being systematically introduced into public oral health service systems in a number of low- and middle income countries. Private practitioners use it. Many publications related to aspects of ART have been published and many more will follow. To achieve quality results with ART one has to attend well-conducted and sufficiently long training courses, preferably in combination with other caries preventive strategies. ART should, therefore, not be considered in isolation and must be part of an evidence-based approach to oral health with a strong foundation based on prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BULUT T, 2004, THESIS COLL DENT SCI
[2]   UK dentists' attitudes and behaviour towards Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for primary teeth [J].
Burke, FJT ;
McHugh, S ;
Shaw, L ;
Hosey, MT ;
Macpherson, L ;
Delargy, S ;
Dopheide, B .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2005, 199 (06) :365-369
[3]  
Abreu DMD, 2009, J CLIN PEDIATR DENT, V34, P151
[4]  
Eden E, 2006, AM J DENT, V19, P359
[5]   A clinical evaluation of resin-based. composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach -: Results at 24 months [J].
Ersin, Nazan Kocatas ;
Candan, Umit ;
Aykut, Arzu ;
Oncag, Ozant ;
Eronat, Cemal ;
Kose, Timur .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 137 (11) :1529-1536
[6]  
Frencken J., 1999, ATRAUMATIC RESTORATI
[7]  
Frencken J E, 1994, Int Dent J, V44, P460
[8]   ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years [J].
Frencken, JE ;
Makoni, F ;
Sithole, WD .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 26 (06) :372-381
[9]   Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: A meta-analysis [J].
Frencken, JE ;
van 't Hof, MA ;
van Amerongen, WE ;
Holmgren, CJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (02) :120-123
[10]  
Frencken JEFM., 2002, Basic Package of Oral Care: WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health Care Planning and Future Scenarios