Reputation offsets trust judgments based on social biases among Airbnb users

被引:91
作者
Abrahao, Bruno [1 ]
Parigi, Paolo [2 ]
Gupta, Alok [3 ]
Cook, Karen S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Sociol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Inst Res Social Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Airbnb, Data Sci Div, San Francisco, CA 94103 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
online trust; reputation systems; sharing economy; social biases; risk; RISK;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1604234114
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To provide social exchange on a global level, sharing-economy companies leverage interpersonal trust between their members on a scale unimaginable even a few years ago. A challenge to this mission is the presence of social biases among a large heterogeneous and independent population of users, a factor that hinders the growth of these services. We investigate whether and to what extent a sharing-economy platform can design artificially engineered features, such as reputation systems, to override people's natural tendency to base judgments of trustworthiness on social biases. We focus on the common tendency to trust others who are similar (i.e., homophily) as a source of bias. We test this argument through an online experiment with 8,906 users of Airbnb, a leading hospitality company in the sharing economy. The experiment is based on an interpersonal investment game, in which we vary the characteristics of recipients to study trust through the interplay between homophily and reputation. Our findings show that reputation systems can significantly increase the trust between dissimilar users and that risk aversion has an inverse relationship with trust given high reputation. We also present evidence that our experimental findings are confirmed by analyses of 1 million actual hospitality interactions among users of Airbnb.
引用
收藏
页码:9848 / 9853
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SSRN
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 31 INT C MACH LEAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men
[5]   TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY [J].
BERG, J ;
DICKHAUT, J ;
MCCABE, K .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :122-142
[6]  
Blau P.M., 1977, AM J SOCIOL, V83, P26
[7]  
Cook KS, 2003, RUSSELL SAGE TRUST, V6, P209
[8]   Trust in Risk Management: A Model-Based Review of Empirical Research [J].
Earle, Timothy C. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (04) :541-574
[9]  
Edelman B, 2005, 14054 HARV BUS SCH
[10]   An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods [J].
Gneezy, U ;
Potters, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) :631-645