Collaborative efforts on energy transition in urban China: Institutional enabling and constraining conditions

被引:7
作者
Wu, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Zuidema, Christian [1 ]
De Roo, Gert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, NL-9747 Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, HeXie Management Res Ctr, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
关键词
Stakeholder collaboration; IAD framework; Institutional analysis; Energy transition; Urban China; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY INTEGRATION; TRANSACTION COST ECONOMICS; STAKEHOLDER COLLABORATION; DISCURSIVE INSTITUTIONALISM; SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION; INFORMAL INSTITUTIONS; FORMAL INSTITUTIONS; GOVERNANCE; POWER; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112873
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concern about carbon has led to China's energy transition and dedication to large-scale renewable energy projects. Handling energy transition problems and implementing energy policies require integrated and collaborative strategies involving an array of stakeholders. Pursuing a successful collaboration among stake-holders is indeed complicated, particularly within China's strong top-down, regulatory policy framework. This article seeks to understand how current institutional rules and routines affect local energy practices, and iden-tifies key institutional barriers and opportunities for collaborative governance in local energy practices. This article opts for an expansion of the IAD framework. In doing so, it targets the informal patterns of interaction to conduct our institutional analysis through a case study of a decentralised photovoltaic (PV) power generation project in Guangzhou, southern China. A total of 16 semi-structured interviews together with an in-depth analysis of policy documents were conducted. This article identifies several key problems in Guangzhou related to the structure of Chinese energy governance that are also likely to occur in other Chinese cities. Notably this study discovered important power imbalances between stakeholders, and found that the grid operators hold the monopoly position in the development of the decentralised PV projects. The issue of power imbalances has triggered a chain of problems within the decentralised PV project, including financial difficulties, information opacity, and ineffective supervision. As such, these problems are major barriers to situation-specific policies that build on integrated strategies and collaborative approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Applying institutional theory to the low-carbon energy transition [J].
Andrews-Speed, Philip .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 13 :216-225
[2]  
AndrewsSpeed P, 2012, ENERG CLIM ENVIRON, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137284037
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GUANGZH STAT YB
[4]   Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2018, 28 (01) :16-32
[5]   Decentralised laboratories in the German energy transition. Why local renewable energy initiatives must reinvent themselves [J].
Beermann, Jan ;
Tews, Kerstin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 169 :125-134
[6]   Towards a Joint Local Energy Transition Process in Urban Districts: The GO2Zero Simulation Game [J].
Bekebrede, Geertje ;
van Bueren, Ellen ;
Wenzler, Ivo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[7]   Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance - An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes [J].
Brisbois, Marie Claire ;
Morris, Michelle ;
de Loe, Rob .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 120 :159-168
[8]   How decentralization drives a change of the institutional framework on the distribution grid level in the electricity sector - The case of local congestion markets [J].
Buchmann, Marius .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 145 (145)
[9]   Fragmented authorities, institutional misalignments, and challenges to renewable energy transition: A case study of wind power curtailment in China [J].
Cai, Yifan ;
Aoyama, Yuko .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 41 :71-79
[10]  
Chen MH, 2017, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, V29, P313, DOI [10.1080/08276331.2017.1300849, 10.1080/08276331.2017.1300849, DOI 10.1080/08276331.2017.1300849]