Why astrology doesn't work

被引:7
|
作者
Kelly, IW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Educ, Dept Educ Psychol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2466/PR0.82.2.527-546
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The survival and longevity of astrology has been dependent on an astrological community that will, under no circumstances, allow it to fail. Consequently, a large array of ad hoc hypotheses (escape routes) have been marshaled over the years to prevent contrary evidence from being used to confront central tenets of astrology. The result is a closed system with little, if any, empirical grounding. It is further argued that the fit of people to birth charts (horoscopes) lies in several unremarkable, lax rules of astrological interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 546
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why Security Doesn't Work
    Speight, Peter
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SECURITY RESEARCH, 2010, 5 (02) : 234 - 270
  • [2] Why Edison doesn't work
    O'Reilly, B
    FORTUNE, 2002, 146 (12) : 149 - +
  • [3] Why doesn't audit work?
    Miller, E
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7135): : 875 - 876
  • [4] Why Lean doesn't work for everyone
    Kaplan, Gary S.
    Patterson, Sarah H.
    Ching, Joan M.
    Blackmore, C. Craig
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (12) : 970 - 973
  • [5] 'Why Partnership Working Doesn't Work'
    Dickinson, Helen
    Glasby, Jon
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 12 (06) : 811 - 828
  • [6] Why doesn't this hemodialysis catheter work?
    Granata, Antonio
    Figuera, Michele
    Basile, Andantonio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2008, 51 (05) : XLII - XLIV
  • [7] Why education doesn't work - an introduction
    Ferguson, Maria
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2014, 96 (02) : 74 - 75
  • [8] Why the Method of Cases Doesn't Work
    Suhler, Christopher
    REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10 (04) : 825 - 847
  • [9] Why TQM doesn't usually work
    Eskildson, L
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 21 (01) : 93 - 94
  • [10] Why the Method of Cases Doesn’t Work
    Christopher Suhler
    Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2019, 10 : 825 - 847