Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears

被引:31
作者
Fu, Qian-Jie [1 ]
Galvin, John J., III [1 ]
Wang, Xiaosong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
COCHLEAR IMPLANT; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; PRESERVATION OUTCOMES; PITCH PERCEPTION; MUSIC PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; STIMULATION; ADAPTATION; NOISE; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-12298-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Advances in cochlear implant (CI) technology allow for acoustic and electric hearing to be combined within the same ear (electric-acoustic stimulation, or EAS) and/or across ears (bimodal listening). Integration efficiency (IE; the ratio between observed and predicted performance for acoustic-electric hearing) can be used to estimate how well acoustic and electric hearing are combined. The goal of this study was to evaluate factors that affect IE in EAS and bimodal listening. Vowel recognition was measured in normal-hearing subjects listening to simulations of unimodal, EAS, and bimodal listening. The input/output frequency range for acoustic hearing was 0.1-0.6 kHz. For CI simulations, the output frequency range was 1.2-8.0 kHz to simulate a shallow insertion depth and the input frequency range was varied to provide increasing amounts of speech information and tonotopic mismatch. Performance was best when acoustic and electric hearing was combined in the same ear. IE was significantly better for EAS than for bimodal listening; IE was sensitive to tonotopic mismatch for EAS, but not for bimodal listening. These simulation results suggest acoustic and electric hearing may be more effectively and efficiently combined within rather than across ears, and that tonotopic mismatch should be minimized to maximize the benefit of acoustic-electric hearing, especially for EAS.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Armstrong M, 1997, AM J OTOL, V18, pS140
[2]  
Baskent D, 2007, EAR HEARING, V28, P277
[3]   ON THE FUSION OF SOUNDS REACHING DIFFERENT SENSE ORGANS [J].
BROADBENT, DE ;
LADEFOGED, P .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1957, 29 (06) :708-710
[4]   Achieving Electric-Acoustic Benefit with a Modulated Tone [J].
Brown, Christopher A. ;
Bacon, Sid P. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2009, 30 (05) :489-493
[5]   Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear [J].
Carlyon, Robert P. ;
Macherey, Olivier ;
Frijns, Johan H. M. ;
Axon, Patrick R. ;
Kalkman, Randy K. ;
Boyle, Patrick ;
Baguley, David M. ;
Briggs, John ;
Deeks, John M. ;
Briaire, Jeroen J. ;
Barreau, Xavier ;
Dauman, Rene .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 11 (04) :625-640
[6]   Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition [J].
Chatterjee, Monita ;
Peng, Shu-Chen .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 235 (1-2) :143-156
[7]   Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users [J].
Crew, Joseph D. ;
Galvin, John J., III ;
Fu, Qian-Jie .
TRENDS IN HEARING, 2016, 20
[8]   Contributions of Electric and Acoustic Hearing to Bimodal Speech and Music Perception [J].
Crew, Joseph D. ;
Galvin, John J., III ;
Landsberger, David M. ;
Fu, Qian-Jie .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03)
[9]   Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding [J].
Dorman, MF ;
Loizou, PC ;
Rainey, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 102 (05) :2993-2996
[10]   Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS) [J].
Dorman, MF ;
Spahr, AJ ;
Loizou, PC ;
Dana, CJ ;
Schmidt, JS .
EAR AND HEARING, 2005, 26 (04) :371-380