Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer

被引:22
|
作者
Sun, G. [1 ,3 ]
Lou, Z. [1 ]
Zhang, H. [1 ]
Yu, G. Y. [1 ]
Zheng, K. [1 ]
Gao, X. H. [1 ]
Meng, R. G. [1 ]
Gong, H. F. [1 ]
Furnee, E. J. B. [3 ]
Bai, C. G. [2 ]
Zhang, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Changhai Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Changhai Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rectal neoplasms; Surgery; Disease-free survival; Postoperative complications; Margins of excision; Follow-up studies; Neoplasm recurrence; Local; Low anterior resection syndrome; PREOPERATIVE RADIATION-THERAPY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; ANTERIOR RESECTION; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; SAVING RESECTION; FECAL CONTINENCE; ANAL-SPHINCTER; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-020-02229-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) is a new surgical procedure for very low rectal cancers (within 4-5 cm from the anal verge). CSPO preserves more of the dentate line and distal rectal wall and also avoids injuring nerves in the intersphincteric space, resulting in satisfactory anal function after resection. The aim of this study was to analyze the short-term surgical results and long-term oncological and functional outcomes of CSPO. Methods Consecutive patients with very low rectal cancer, who had CSPO between January 2011 and October 2018 at Changhai Hospital, Shanghai were included. Patient demographics, clinicopathological features, oncological outcomes and anal function were analyzed. Results A total of 102 patients (67 men) with a mean age of 56.9 +/- 10.8 years were included. The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3 (IQR, 3-4) cm. Thirty-five patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). The median distal resection margin (DRM) was 0.5 (IQR, 0.3-0.8) cm. One patient had a positive DRM. All circumferential margins were negative. There was no perioperative mortality. The postoperative complication rate was 19.6%. The median duration of follow-up was 28 (IQR, 12-45.5) months. The local recurrence rate was 2% and distant metastasis rate was 10.8%. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 100% and 83.9%, respectively. The mean Wexner incontinence and low anterior resection syndrome scores 12 months after ileostomy reversal were 5.9 +/- 4.3, and 29.2 +/- 6.9, respectively. Conclusions For patients with very low rectal cancers, fecal continence can be preserved with CSPO without compromising oncological results.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1034
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer
    Sun, Zhenqiang
    Yu, Xianbo
    Wang, Haijiang
    Ma, Ming
    Zhao, Zeliang
    Wang, Qisan
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (02) : 484 - 490
  • [22] Oncologic outcomes of intersphincteric resection without preoperative chemoradiotherapy for very low rectal cancer
    Akagi, Yoshito
    Shirouzu, Kazuo
    Ogata, Yutaka
    Kinugasa, Tetsushi
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2013, 22 (02): : 144 - 149
  • [23] Evaluation of long-term oncological outcomes of inter-sphincter resection compared with abdominoperineal resection for treatment of ultra-low rectal cancers: a single center 5-year experience
    Anaraki, Fakhrosadat
    Alemrajabi, Mahdi
    Shekouhi, Ramin
    Sohooli, Maryam
    Sabz, Seyed-Ali
    SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [24] Sphincter-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Techniques, Oncologic Outcomes, and Functional Results
    Bordeianou, Liliana
    Maguire, Lillias Holmes
    Alavi, Karim
    Sudan, Ranjan
    Wise, Paul E.
    Kaiser, Andreas M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (07) : 1358 - 1372
  • [25] Shared decision-making and informed consent process in rectal cancer treatment: weighing up oncological and functional outcomes
    Ribas, Y.
    Hotouras, A.
    Wexner, S. D.
    D'Hoore, A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [26] Functional results of surgical treatment of low-ultralow rectal cancer
    Tartaglia, Nicola
    Pacilli, Mario
    Pavone, Giovanna
    Fersini, Alberto
    Lizzi, Vincenzo
    Vovola, Fernando
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Neri, Vincenzo
    Ambrosi, Antonio
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2021, 92 (05) : 521 - 530
  • [27] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Comparison of the Operative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    Yoo, Byung-Eun
    Cho, Jae-Sung
    Shin, Jae-Won
    Lee, Dong-Won
    Kwak, Jung-Myun
    Kim, Jin
    Kim, Seon-Hahn
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (04) : 1219 - 1225
  • [28] Shared Decision-Making, Sphincter Preservation, and Rectal Cancer Treatment: Identifying and Executing What Matters Most to Patients
    Ivatury, Srinivas Joga
    Suwanabol, Pasithorn A.
    De Roo, Ana C.
    CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2024, 37 (04) : 256 - 265
  • [29] Intersphincteric Resection for Patients With Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Oncological and Functional Outcomes
    Park, In Ja
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2018, 34 (04) : 167 - 174
  • [30] Oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of low rectal cancer: A retrospective review of a single UK tertiary centre experience
    Hussain, Anwar
    Mahmood, Fahad
    Torrance, Andrew D. W.
    Clarke, Helen
    Howitt, Cordelia
    Dawson, Robin
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2018, 34 : 28 - 33