Characteristics of on-demand biogas production by using sugar beet silage

被引:17
作者
Ahmed, Sharif [1 ]
Kazda, Marian [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Systemat Bot & Ecol, Albert Einstein Allee 11, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
关键词
On-demand biogas production; Intermittent feeding; Grass silage; Sugar beet silage; Modelling; Gaussian curve; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ORGANIC FRACTION; GRASS-SILAGE; CO-DIGESTION; METHANE; MANURE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.04.016
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
On-demand electricity generation can be achieved by just-in-time biogas production instantly utilized in co-generation units. For this goal, easily degradable substrates like sugar beet silage have a high potential. Potential for on-demand biogas production from co-digestion of sugar beet silage (SS) with grass silage (GS) was evaluated in two experiments at organic loading rates (OLRs) of 1.5 kgVS m(-3) day(-1) and 2.5 kgVS m(-3) day(-1), respectively. Each experiment was fed with intermittent feeding system at 8 hrs interval at the same feedstock ratios (volatile solids based) of GS:SS-1:0, 3:1 and 1:3, respectively. Modelling by Gaussian equation was performed in order to understand the effects of SS on biogas production. Addition of sugar beet silage led to maximum biogas production within a short time, but it differed significantly depending on feedstock ratios and OLRs, respectively. At OLR 1.5 kgVS m(-3) day(-1), during mono fermentation of grass silage maximum biogas production rate of 0.27 1(N) hr(-1) was reached at 2.74 hrs. Production rate did not change at feedstock ratio of GS:SS-3:1 but increased to 0.64 1N hr(-1) at GS:SS-1:3 within a shorter time span (1.58 hrs). On the contrary, at OLR of 2.5 kgVS m(-3) day(-1) time span between feedstock input and maximum biogas production did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) among the reactors. Biogas production rates were 0.601(N) hr(-1) within 2.27 hrs and 0.821(N) hr(-1) within 2.30 hrs at GS:SS-3:1 and GS:SS-1:3, respectively. Surprisingly, there was no time lag between maximum biogas and methane production rates, irrespectively of OLR. This implies that once the whole microbial community is adapted to intermittent substrate input, the metabolic products are instantly utilized through the all steps of anaerobic substrate degradation. Applying this finding opens new perspectives for on-demand biogas energy production. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 121
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
Drosg B., 2013, IEA BIOENERGY TASK 3, P30
[12]   Investigation into the effect of high concentrations of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion on methanogenic communities [J].
Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H. ;
Walter, Andreas ;
Ebner, Christian ;
Insam, Heribert .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (11) :2080-2089
[13]   Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians [J].
Ghasemi, Asghar ;
Zahediasl, Saleh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2012, 10 (02) :486-489
[14]   Review of concepts for a demand-driven biogas supply for flexible power generation [J].
Hahn, Henning ;
Krautkremer, Bernd ;
Hartmann, Kilian ;
Wachendorf, Michael .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 :383-393
[15]   Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion: Case study on recycled paper mill effluent using Modified Anaerobic Hybrid Baffled (MAHB) reactor [J].
Hassan, Siti Roshayu ;
Zaman, Nastaein Qamaruz ;
Dahlan, Irvan .
KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 19 (05) :1271-1276
[16]   The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization [J].
Holm-Nielsen, J. B. ;
Al Seadi, T. ;
Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (22) :5478-5484
[17]  
Kalac P., 2012, J AGROBIOL, V28, P85
[18]   Mono fermentation of grass silage by means of loop reactors [J].
Koch, Konrad ;
Wichern, Marc ;
Luebken, Manfred ;
Horn, Harald .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (23) :5934-5940
[19]   Anaerobic digestion of by-products of sugar beet and starch potato processing [J].
Kryvoruchko, Vitaliy ;
Machmueller, Andrea ;
Bodiroza, Vitomir ;
Amon, Barbara ;
Amon, Thomas .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (04) :620-627
[20]   Biogas production from co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid, and solid state conditions [J].
Li, Yeqing ;
Zhang, Ruihong ;
Chen, Chang ;
Liu, Guangqing ;
He, Yanfeng ;
Liu, Xiaoying .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 149 :406-412