Disturbed eating behaviors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. How to screen for yellow flags in clinical practice?

BackgroundAdolescents with type 1 diabetes are at an increased risk of disturbed eating behaviors (DEBs). ObjectiveThe aims of this study are to (i) explore the prevalence of DEBs and associated yellow flags', and (ii) establish concordance between adolescents-parents and adolescents-clinicians with respect to DEBs. MethodsAdolescents (11-16yr) and parents completed questionnaires. A stepwise approach was used to assess DEBs: only adolescents whose answers raised psychological yellow flags for DEBs completed the Diabetes Eating Problems Scale-Revised and questions from the AHEAD study. Parents and clinicians shared their observations regarding possible DEBs. Kruskal-Wallis tests, post hoc Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-squared tests were utilized to examine clinical yellow flags. Cohen's kappa was used to assess concordance. ResultsOf 103 adolescents participated (51.5% girls), answers of 47 (46.5%) raised psychological yellow flags, indicating body and weight concerns. A total of 8% scored above cut-off for DEBs. Clinical yellow flags were elevated glycated hemoglobin A1c (p=0.004), older age (p=0.034), dieting frequency (p=0.001), reduced quality of life (p=0.007), less diabetes self-confidence (p=0.015), worsened diabetes management (p<0.001), and body dissatisfaction (p<0.001). Body Mass Index (BMI) z-scores and gender were no yellow flags. Concordance between parents and adolescents was slight (k=0.126 and 0.141), and clinicians and adolescents was fair (k=0.332). DiscussionHalf of the adolescents reported body and weight concerns, less than 1 in 10 reported DEBs. Screening for yellow flags for DEBs as a part of clinical routine using a stepwise approach and early assistance is recommended to prevent onset or deterioration of DEBs.