What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review

被引:23
|
作者
Ahmed, Kanwal [1 ]
Hashim, Salma [1 ]
Khankhara, Mariyam [1 ]
Said, Ilhan [1 ]
Shandakumar, Amrita Tara [2 ]
Zaman, Sadia [1 ]
Veiga, Andre [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Business Sch, London, England
关键词
financial incentives; pay for performance; general practice; quality improvement; primary care; PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; UNITED-KINGDOM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001127
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn the UK, the National Health Service has various incentivisation schemes in place to improve the provision of high-quality care. The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) and other Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes are incentive frameworks that focus on meeting predetermined clinical outcomes. However, the ability of these schemes to meet their aims is debated.Objectives(1) To explore current incentive schemes available in general practice in the UK, their impact and effectiveness in improving quality of care and (2) To identify other types of incentives discussed in the literature.MethodsThis systematic literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Six databases were searched: Cochrane, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, Health Management Information Consortium, Embase and Health Management. Articles were screened according to the selection criteria, evaluated against critical appraisal checklists and categorised into themes.Results35 articles were included from an initial search result of 22087. Articles were categorised into the following three overarching themes: financial incentives, non-financial incentives and competition.DiscussionThe majority of the literature focused on QOF. Its positive effects included reduced mortality rates, better data recording and improved sociodemographic inequalities. However, limitations involved decreased quality of care in non-incentivised activities, poor patient experiences due to tick-box exercises and increased pressure to meet non-specific targets. Findings surrounding competition were mixed, with limited evidence found on the use of non-financial incentives in primary care.ConclusionCurrent research looks extensively into financial incentives, however, we propose more research into the effects of intrinsic motivation alongside existing P4P schemes to enhance motivation and improve quality of care.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Residential Aged Care Medication Review to Improve the Quality of Medication Use: A Systematic Review
    Thiruchelvam, Kaeshaelya
    Hasan, Syed Shahzad
    Wong, Pei Se
    Kairuz, Therese
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 18 (01) : 87.e1 - 87.e14
  • [42] Quality Indicators for Depression Treatment in Primary Care: A Systematic Literature Review
    Duhoux, Arnaud
    Fournier, Louise
    Menear, Matthew
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REVIEWS, 2011, 7 (02) : 104 - 137
  • [43] Patient-centred care in general dental practice - a systematic review of the literature
    Mills, Ian
    Frost, Julia
    Cooper, Chris
    Moles, David R.
    Kay, Elizabeth
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [44] Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care: Exploratory Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views
    Blease, Charlotte
    Kaptchuk, Ted J.
    Bernstein, Michael H.
    Mandl, Kenneth D.
    Halamka, John D.
    DesRoches, Catherine M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (03)
  • [45] Effect of pay for performance to improve quality of maternal and child care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
    Das, Ashis
    Gopalan, Saji S.
    Chandramohan, Daniel
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 16
  • [46] PROTOCOLS USED BY UK GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS, WHAT IS EXPECTED OF THEM AND WHAT SOLUTIONS ARE PROVIDED
    YOUNG, A
    BESWICK, K
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1995, 48 (1-2) : 85 - 90
  • [47] What information do general practitioners need to care for patients with lung cancer? A survey of general practitioners perceptions
    Rowlands, Stella
    Callen, Joanne
    Westbrook, Johanna
    HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 39 (01) : 8 - 16
  • [48] What do doctors understand by spiritual health? A survey of UK general practitioners
    Whitehead, Orla
    Jagger, Carol
    Hanratty, Barbara
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [49] What is the present role for general practitioners in dementia care? Experiences of general practitioners, patients and family carers in Portugal
    Balsinha, Conceicao
    Iliffe, Steve
    Dias, Sonia
    Freitas, Alexandre
    Grave, Joana
    Goncalves-Pereira, Manuel
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (06): : 1988 - 2006
  • [50] Developing cultural competence in general practitioners: an integrative review of the literature
    Kelly Watt
    Penny Abbott
    Jenny Reath
    BMC Family Practice, 17