What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review

被引:23
|
作者
Ahmed, Kanwal [1 ]
Hashim, Salma [1 ]
Khankhara, Mariyam [1 ]
Said, Ilhan [1 ]
Shandakumar, Amrita Tara [2 ]
Zaman, Sadia [1 ]
Veiga, Andre [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Business Sch, London, England
关键词
financial incentives; pay for performance; general practice; quality improvement; primary care; PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; UNITED-KINGDOM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001127
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn the UK, the National Health Service has various incentivisation schemes in place to improve the provision of high-quality care. The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) and other Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes are incentive frameworks that focus on meeting predetermined clinical outcomes. However, the ability of these schemes to meet their aims is debated.Objectives(1) To explore current incentive schemes available in general practice in the UK, their impact and effectiveness in improving quality of care and (2) To identify other types of incentives discussed in the literature.MethodsThis systematic literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Six databases were searched: Cochrane, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, Health Management Information Consortium, Embase and Health Management. Articles were screened according to the selection criteria, evaluated against critical appraisal checklists and categorised into themes.Results35 articles were included from an initial search result of 22087. Articles were categorised into the following three overarching themes: financial incentives, non-financial incentives and competition.DiscussionThe majority of the literature focused on QOF. Its positive effects included reduced mortality rates, better data recording and improved sociodemographic inequalities. However, limitations involved decreased quality of care in non-incentivised activities, poor patient experiences due to tick-box exercises and increased pressure to meet non-specific targets. Findings surrounding competition were mixed, with limited evidence found on the use of non-financial incentives in primary care.ConclusionCurrent research looks extensively into financial incentives, however, we propose more research into the effects of intrinsic motivation alongside existing P4P schemes to enhance motivation and improve quality of care.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] General practitioners' role in improving health care in care homes: a realist review
    Chadborn, Neil H.
    Devi, Reena
    Goodman, Claire
    Williams, Christopher D.
    Sartain, Kate
    Gordon, Adam L.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2022, : 119 - 127
  • [32] Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners' (GPs') views and experiences of providing postnatal care
    Macdonald, Clare
    MacGregor, Becky
    Hillman, Sarah
    MacArthur, Christine
    Bick, Debra
    Taylor, Beck
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [33] Transitions of care interventions to improve quality of life among patients hospitalized with acute conditions: a systematic literature review
    Oyesanya, Tolu O.
    Loflin, Callan
    Byom, Lindsey
    Harris, Gabrielle
    Daly, Kaitlyn
    Rink, Lesley
    Bettger, Janet Prvu
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [34] Recognition and management of perinatal depression and anxiety by general practitioners: a systematic review
    Ford, Elizabeth
    Shakespeare, Judy
    Elias, Fatin
    Ayers, Susan
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [35] The Use of Data for Process and Quality Improvement in Long Term Care and Home Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Sales, Anne E.
    Bostrom, Anne-Marie
    Bucknall, Tracey
    Draper, Kellie
    Fraser, Kimberly
    Schalm, Corinne
    Warren, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 13 (02) : 103 - 113
  • [36] The impact of reimbursement systems on equity in access and quality of primary care: A systematic literature review
    Tao, Wenjing
    Agerholm, Janne
    Burstroem, Bo
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16 : 1 - 10
  • [37] Type 2 diabetes continuing medical education for general practitioners: what works? A systematic review
    Thepwongsa, I.
    Kirby, C.
    Schattner, P.
    Shaw, J.
    Piterman, L.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2014, 31 (12) : 1488 - 1497
  • [38] Does Performance-Based Remuneration for Individual Health Care Practitioners Affect Patient Care? A Systematic Review
    Houle, Sherilyn K. D.
    McAlister, Finlay A.
    Jackevicius, Cynthia A.
    Chuck, Anderson W.
    Tsuyuki, Ross T.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (12) : 889 - U240
  • [39] Cooperation between general practitioners and pharmacists: a systematic review
    Michot, Pauline
    Catala, Olivier
    Supper, Irene
    Boulieu, Roselyne
    Zerbib, Yves
    Colin, Cyrille
    Letrilliart, Laurent
    SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2013, 25 (03): : 331 - 341
  • [40] The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review
    Knight, Andrew Walter
    Tam, Chun Wah Michael
    Dennis, Sarah
    Fraser, John
    Pond, Dimity
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (02)