What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review

被引:23
|
作者
Ahmed, Kanwal [1 ]
Hashim, Salma [1 ]
Khankhara, Mariyam [1 ]
Said, Ilhan [1 ]
Shandakumar, Amrita Tara [2 ]
Zaman, Sadia [1 ]
Veiga, Andre [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Business Sch, London, England
关键词
financial incentives; pay for performance; general practice; quality improvement; primary care; PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; UNITED-KINGDOM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001127
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn the UK, the National Health Service has various incentivisation schemes in place to improve the provision of high-quality care. The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) and other Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes are incentive frameworks that focus on meeting predetermined clinical outcomes. However, the ability of these schemes to meet their aims is debated.Objectives(1) To explore current incentive schemes available in general practice in the UK, their impact and effectiveness in improving quality of care and (2) To identify other types of incentives discussed in the literature.MethodsThis systematic literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Six databases were searched: Cochrane, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, Health Management Information Consortium, Embase and Health Management. Articles were screened according to the selection criteria, evaluated against critical appraisal checklists and categorised into themes.Results35 articles were included from an initial search result of 22087. Articles were categorised into the following three overarching themes: financial incentives, non-financial incentives and competition.DiscussionThe majority of the literature focused on QOF. Its positive effects included reduced mortality rates, better data recording and improved sociodemographic inequalities. However, limitations involved decreased quality of care in non-incentivised activities, poor patient experiences due to tick-box exercises and increased pressure to meet non-specific targets. Findings surrounding competition were mixed, with limited evidence found on the use of non-financial incentives in primary care.ConclusionCurrent research looks extensively into financial incentives, however, we propose more research into the effects of intrinsic motivation alongside existing P4P schemes to enhance motivation and improve quality of care.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] General practitioners’ views on quality markers for children in UK primary care: a qualitative study
    Peter J Gill
    Jenny Hislop
    David Mant
    Anthony Harnden
    BMC Family Practice, 13
  • [22] Motivational interviewing by general practitioners for Type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review
    Thepwongsa, Isaraporn
    Muthukumar, Radhakrishnan
    Kessomboon, Pattapong
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (04) : 376 - 383
  • [23] Barriers and facilitators for general practitioners to engage in advance care planning: A systematic review
    De Vleminck, Aline
    Houttekier, Dirk
    Pardon, Koen
    Deschepper, Reginald
    Van Audenhove, Chantal
    Vander Stichele, Robert
    Deliens, Luc
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2013, 31 (04) : 215 - 226
  • [24] Developing cultural competence in general practitioners: an integrative review of the literature
    Watt, Kelly
    Abbott, Penny
    Reath, Jenny
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 17 : 1 - 11
  • [25] Audit and feedback, and continuous quality improvement strategies to improve the quality of care for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of literature
    Vecchi, Simona
    Agabiti, Nera
    Mitrova, Suzana
    Cacciani, Laura
    Amato, Laura
    Davoli, Marina
    Bargagli, Anna Maria
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2016, 40 (3-4): : 215 - 223
  • [26] Educational opportunities in palliative care: what do general practitioners want?
    Shipman, C
    Addington-Hall, J
    Barclay, S
    Briggs, J
    Cox, I
    Daniels, L
    Millar, D
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 15 (03) : 191 - 196
  • [27] Point-of-care ultrasound for general practitioners: a systematic needs assessment
    Lokkegaard, Thomas
    Todsen, Tobias
    Nayahangan, Leizl Joy
    Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer
    Jensen, Martin Bach
    Konge, Lars
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2020, 38 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [28] A systematic review of pharmacogenetic testing in primary care: Attitudes of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists
    Hansen, Johanne Molby
    Norgaard, Josefine D. S. V.
    Sporrong, Sofia Kalvemark
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2022, 18 (08) : 3230 - 3238
  • [29] Quality improvement in pediatric intensive care: A systematic review of the literature
    Kourtis, Susan A.
    Burns, Jeffrey P.
    PEDIATRIC INVESTIGATION, 2019, 3 (02) : 110 - 116
  • [30] Quality improvement in pediatric intensive care: A systematic review of the literature
    Kourtis Susan A
    Burns Jeffrey P
    儿科学研究(英文), 2019, 3 (02) : 110 - 111-112-113-114-115-116