A stochastic self-scheduling program for compressed air energy storage (CAES) of renewable energy sources (RESs) based on a demand response mechanism

被引:134
作者
Ghalelou, Afshin Najafi [1 ]
Fakhri, Alireza Pashaei [2 ]
Nojavan, Sayyad [2 ]
Majidi, Majid [3 ]
Hatami, Hojat [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seraj, Fac Elect Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Tabriz, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, POB 51666-15813, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Tabriz Tech High Educ Ctr, Fac Elect Engn, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Stochastic self-scheduling; Renewable energy sources (RESs); Demand response program (DRP); Compressed air energy storage (CAES); Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP); SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY; POWER; PROCUREMENT; CONSUMER;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.082
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, a stochastic self-scheduling of renewable energy sources (RESs) considering compressed air energy storage (CAES) in the presence of a demand response program (DRP) is proposed. RESs include wind turbine (WI') and photovoltaic (PV) system. Other energy sources are thermal units and CAES. The time-of use (TOU) rate of DRP is considered in this paper. This DRP shifts the percentage of load from the expensive period to the cheap one in order to flatten the load curve and minimize the operation cost, consequently. The proposed objective function includes minimizing the operation costs of thermal unit and CAES, considering technical and physical constraints. The proposed model is formulated as mixed integer linear programming (MILP) and it is been solved using General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) optimization package. Furthermore, CAES and DRP are incorporated in the stochastic self-scheduling problem by a decision maker to reduce the expected operation cost. Meanwhile, the uncertainty models of market price, load, wind speed, temperature and irradiance are considered in the formulation. Finally, to assess the effects of DRP and CAES on self-scheduling problem, four case studies are utilized, and significant results were obtained, which indicate the validity of the proposed stochastic program. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 396
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   RETRACTED: Energy storage system and demand response program effects on stochastic energy procurement of large consumers considering renewable generation (Retracted article. See vol. 14, pg. 6040, 2020) [J].
Aalami, Habib Allah ;
Nojavan, Sayyad .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2016, 10 (01) :107-114
[2]   Optimal operation scheduling of wind power integrated with compressed air energy storage (CAES) [J].
Abbaspour, M. ;
Satkin, M. ;
Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. ;
Lotfi, F. Hoseinzadeh ;
Noorollahi, Y. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 51 :53-59
[3]   Economical assessment of a wind-hydrogen energy system using WindHyGen® software [J].
Aguado, Monica ;
Ayerbe, Elixabete ;
Azcarate, Cristina ;
Blanco, Rosa ;
Garde, Raquel ;
Mallor, Fermin ;
Rivas, David M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (07) :2845-2854
[4]  
[Anonymous], MAJLESI J ENERGY MAN
[5]   Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market [J].
Arroyo, JM ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (03) :1098-1104
[6]   Accessibility for operation and maintenance tasks in co-located wind and wave energy farms with non-uniformly distributed arrays [J].
Astariz, S. ;
Iglesias, G. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 106 :1219-1229
[7]   Reliability-Constrained Optimal Sizing of Energy Storage System in a Microgrid [J].
Bahramirad, Shaghayegh ;
Reder, Wanda ;
Khodaei, Amin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2012, 3 (04) :2056-2062
[8]   Energy storage for mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: An updated review [J].
Beaudin, Marc ;
Zareipour, Hamidreza ;
Schellenberglabe, Anthony ;
Rosehart, William .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 14 (04) :302-314
[9]  
Brooke Anthony., 1998, A User's Guide
[10]   Optimization of pumped storage capacity in an isolated power system with large renewable penetration [J].
Brown, Paul D. ;
Pecas Lopes, J. A. ;
Matos, Manuel A. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (02) :523-531