Risk of Subsequent Revision after Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

被引:219
|
作者
Ong, Kevin L. [1 ]
Lau, Edmund [2 ]
Suggs, Jeremy [1 ]
Kurtz, Steven M. [1 ]
Manley, Michael T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Exponent Inc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Exponent Inc, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[3] Homer Stryker Ctr Orthopaed Educ & Res, Mahwah, NJ USA
关键词
TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT; SURGEON PROCEDURE VOLUME; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; UNITED-STATES; OUTCOMES; INDEX; ASSOCIATION; INFECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-010-1399-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Revision is technically more demanding than primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and requires more extensive use of resources. Understanding the relative risk of rerevision and risk factors can help identify patients at high risk who may require closer postsurgical care. Objectives/purposes We therefore evaluated the risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision TJA in the elderly (65 years or older) patient population and identified corresponding patient risk factors. Patients and Methods Using the 5% Medicare claims data set (1997-2006), we identified a total of 35,746 patients undergoing primary THA and 72,913 undergoing primary TKA; of these, 1205 who had THAs and 1599 who had TKAs underwent initial revision surgery. The rerevision rate after primary and revision TJAs was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The relative risk of revision surgery for primary and revision TJAs was compared using hazard ratio analysis. Results The 5-year survival probabilities were 95.9%, 97.2%, 81.0%, and 87.4% for primary THA and TKA and revision THA and TKA, respectively. Patients with revision arthroplasty were five to six times more likely to undergo rerevision (adjusted relative risk, 4.89 for THA; 5.71 for TKA) compared with patients with primary arthroplasty. Age and comorbidities were associated with initial revision after primary THA and TKA. Conclusions Patients should undergo stringent preoperative screening for preexisting health conditions and careful patient management and followup postoperatively so as to minimize the risk of an initial revision, which otherwise could lead to a significantly greater likelihood of subsequent rerevisions. Level of Evidence Level II, prognostic study. See Guideline for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:3070 / 3076
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What Are the Contemporary Etiologies for Revision Surgery and Revision After Primary, Noncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Ledford, Cameron K.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2019, 27 (24) : 933 - 938
  • [2] UsingMedications for Prediction of Revision after Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Pratt, Nicole L.
    Roughead, Elizabeth E.
    Graves, Stephen E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (12) : 2061 - 2070
  • [3] What Are Risk Factors for Infection after Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 80 Years?
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Anis, Hiba K.
    Vakharia, Rushabh M.
    Acuna, Alexander J.
    Gold, Peter A.
    Garbarino, Luke J.
    Mahmood, Bilal M.
    Arnold, Nicholas R.
    Ehiorobo, Joseph O.
    Grossman, Eric L.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Roche, Martin W.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (08) : 1741 - 1751
  • [4] Risk Factors for Early Revision After Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Dy, Christopher J.
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    Pan, Ting Jung
    Wright, Timothy M.
    Padgett, Douglas E.
    Lyman, Stephen
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2014, 66 (06) : 907 - 915
  • [5] Quantifying the Burden of Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Infection
    Kamath, Atul F.
    Ong, Kevin L.
    Lau, Edmund
    Chan, Vanessa
    Vail, Thomas P.
    Rubash, Harry E.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (09) : 1492 - 1497
  • [6] Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Prokopetz, Julian J. Z.
    Losina, Elena
    Bliss, Robin L.
    Wright, John
    Baron, John A.
    Katz, Jeffrey N.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2012, 13
  • [7] Consensus on Reducing Risk in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Revision Surgery
    Hickernell, Thomas R.
    Cooper, H. John
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 34 (03) : 216 - 221
  • [8] Preoperative Depression Is Associated With Increased Risk Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Wilson, Jacob M.
    Farley, Kevin X.
    Erens, Greg A.
    Bradbury, Thomas L.
    Guild, George N.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (04) : 1048 - 1053
  • [9] Impact of Smoking and Drinking on Complications After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis
    Tirumala, Venkatsaiakhil
    Bounajem, Georges
    Klemt, Christian
    Barghi, Ameen
    Kwon, Young-Min
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (15) : E769 - E781
  • [10] Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Risk and Reason for Revision in Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Dhanjani, Suraj A.
    Schmerler, Jessica
    Wenzel, Alyssa
    Gomez, Gabriela
    Oni, Julius
    Hegde, Vishal
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (19) : E815 - E823