Evaluating the aptitude of global climate models from CMIP5 and CMIP6 in capturing the historical observations of monsoon rainfall over Sudan from 1946 to 2005

被引:7
|
作者
Hamadalnel, Monzer [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Zhiwei [1 ]
Lu, Rui [1 ]
Almazroui, Mansour [3 ,4 ]
Shahid, Shamsuddin [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Joint Int Res Lab Climate & Environm Change, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster,Minist Educ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Omdurman Islamic Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Astron & Meteorol, Omdurman, Sudan
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Meteorol, Ctr Excellence Climate Change Res, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Climat Res Unit, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[5] Univ Teknol Malaysia TUM, Fac Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
evaluation; global climate model; monsoon; precipitation; Sudan; EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; COUPLED MODEL; MEAN STATE; VARIABILITY; PRECIPITATION; PERFORMANCE; OCEAN;
D O I
10.1002/joc.7387
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Sudan is one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change in the African Sahel region. Given the urgent need to understand the potential behaviour of the future climate, this study assessed the skill of 32 global climate models (GCMs) from the fifth (CMIP5) and the sixth (CMIP6) phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) in simulating summer monsoon precipitation over Sudan for the period 1946-2005. The models were ranked based on the Skills Score, estimated using three statistical metrics, correlation coefficient, index of agreement, and normalized root mean square error. The best performing models and their ensembles were used for long-term trend quantification, empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis, and assessment of precipitation associations with atmospheric circulation. GISS-E2-H, IPSL-CM5A-MR, and MPI-ESM-LR of CMIP5 and BCC-CSM2-MR, INM-CM4-8, and MPI-ESM1-2-LR of CMIP6 showed the best performance in Sudan. Instead of August's unimodal peak rainfall, the GCMs, especially the CMIP5 GCMs, showed an unrealistic rainfall peak in May and a shift of the August rainfall peak to September. Only the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble reliably reproduced the unimodal rainfall property. All models of both phases failed to reconstruct the dominant mode of monsoon precipitation as determined using EOF analysis, particularly in the country's southern parts. The models also failed to reproduce the long-term rainfall trends in different climate zones. Only MPI-ESM-LR (CMIP5) and MPI-ESM1-2-LR (CMIP6) were successful in simulating monsoon rainfall associations with sea surface temperature, El Nino-Southern Oscillation teleconnection, and winds components at 850 hPa.
引用
收藏
页码:2717 / 2738
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inconsistency in historical simulations and future projections of temperature and rainfall: A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models over Southeast Asia
    Hamed, Mohammed Magdy
    Nashwan, Mohamed Salem
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    bin Ismail, Tarmizi
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    Dewan, Ashraf
    Asaduzzaman, Md
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2022, 265
  • [22] Wind energy resource over Europe under CMIP6 future climate projections: What changes from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Carvalho, D.
    Rocha, A.
    Costoya, X.
    DeCastro, M.
    Gomez-Gesteira, M.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 151
  • [23] An assessment of temperature simulations by CMIP6 climate models over the Tibetan Plateau and differences with CMIP5 climate models
    Hu, Qin
    Hua, Wei
    Yang, Kaiqing
    Ming, Jing
    Ma, Pan
    Zhao, Yong
    Fan, Guangzhou
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 148 (1-2) : 223 - 236
  • [24] An assessment of temperature simulations by CMIP6 climate models over the Tibetan Plateau and differences with CMIP5 climate models
    Qin Hu
    Wei Hua
    Kaiqing Yang
    Jing Ming
    Pan Ma
    Yong Zhao
    Guangzhou Fan
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 148 : 223 - 236
  • [25] Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia
    Sahar Hadi Pour
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Mohammed Mainuddin
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 709 - 725
  • [26] Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia
    Pour, Sahar Hadi
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Mainuddin, Mohammed
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (1-2) : 709 - 725
  • [27] Projection of climate extremes in China, an incremental exercise from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Zhu, Huanhuan
    Jiang, Zhihong
    Li, Laurent
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2021, 66 (24) : 2528 - 2537
  • [28] Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Nijsse, Femke J. M. M.
    Cox, Peter M.
    Williamson, Mark S.
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2020, 11 (03) : 737 - 750
  • [29] Comprehensive assessment of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating and projecting precipitation over the global land
    Du, Yi
    Wang, Dagang
    Zhu, Jinxin
    Wang, Dayang
    Qi, Xiaoxing
    Cai, Jingheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (13) : 6859 - 6875
  • [30] Evaluation of seasonal teleconnections to remote drivers of Australian rainfall in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Chung, Christine
    Boschat, Ghyslaine
    Taschetto, Andrea
    Narsey, Sugata
    McGregor, Shayne
    Santoso, Agus
    Delage, Francois
    JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE EARTH SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2024, 74 (01):