Retrospective analysis of circulatory support with the Impella CP® device in patients with therapy refractory cardiogenic shock

被引:13
作者
Lackermair, K. [1 ]
Sattler, S. [1 ,2 ]
Huber, B. C. [1 ]
Grabmaier, U. [1 ,3 ]
Weckbach, L. T. [1 ]
Bauer, A. [1 ,3 ]
Theiss, H. D. [1 ]
Hausleiter, J. [1 ,3 ]
Mehilli, J. [1 ,3 ]
Massberg, S. [1 ,3 ]
Brunner, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Munich Univ Clin, Dept Cardiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Rigshosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Ctr Heart, Dept Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Deutsch Zentrum Herz Kreislauf Forsch EV, Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
关键词
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In cardiogenic shock (CS) the Impella CP (R) device provides a fast available left ventricular circulatory support of up to 4.0 L/min. However, the use of the Impella CP (R) device was not systematically analysed yet. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 28 consecutive patients suffering from severe therapy refractory CS treated with Impella CP (R). Mortality was estimated using the SAPS II-Score. Primary outcome was 30-day survival. We compared the different aetiologies of CS and the effect of additional extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Results: Aetiology of CS was acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 15 patients, 9 patients received additional therapy with ECLS. SAPS II was 73 +/- 14, representing an estimated mortality of 87.1%. 18 patients deceased representing a 30-day survival of 36%. Comparing the different aetiologies, ACS-CS patients show a trend towards better survival. Additional therapy with ECLS did not change 30-day survival. In 3 cases, vascular complication needing surgical treatment occurred. All other patients showed no relevant complications except for the commonly seen haemolysis with consecutive need of transfusion. Conclusion: Our data could demonstrate that the Impella CP (R) application in these severely diseased patients is feasible and safe. Compared to the estimated mortality, the 30-day survival seems to be improved. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 203
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Acharya D, 2014, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V26, pE109
  • [2] Incidence of Hemolysis in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Treated with Impella Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Badiye, Amit P.
    Hernandez, Gabriel A.
    Novoa, Italo
    Chaparro, Sandra V.
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [3] Impella Induced Massive Hemolysis: Reemphasizing Echocardiographic Guidance for Correct Placement
    Cardozo, Shaun
    Ahmed, Tasneem
    Belgrave, Kevin
    [J]. CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [4] The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: The Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Cocchieri, Ricardo
    Driessen, Antoine H.
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Vis, Marije M.
    Baan, Jan
    de Jong, Mark
    Lagrand, Wim K.
    van der Sloot, Jos A. P.
    Tijssen, Jan G.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    de Mol, Bas A. S.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Henriques, Jose P. J. M.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (09) : 2072 - 2079
  • [5] Fröhlich G, 2015, MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, V110, P225, DOI 10.1007/s00063-014-0426-4
  • [6] Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction - Expanding the paradigm
    Hochman, JS
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (24) : 2998 - 3002
  • [7] A NEW SIMPLIFIED ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY SCORE (SAPS-II) BASED ON A EUROPEAN NORTH-AMERICAN MULTICENTER STUDY
    LEGALL, JR
    LEMESHOW, S
    SAULNIER, F
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (24): : 2957 - 2963
  • [8] Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome
    Prondzinsky, Roland
    Lemm, Henning
    Swyter, Michael
    Wegener, Nikolas
    Unverzagt, Susanne
    Carter, Justin M.
    Russ, Martin
    Schlitt, Axel
    Buerke, Ute
    Christoph, Amd
    Schmidt, Hendrik
    Winkler, Matthias
    Thiery, Joachim
    Werdan, Karl
    Buerke, Michael
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (01) : 152 - 160
  • [9] Extracorporal life support (ECLS) in acute ischaemic cardiogenic shock
    Sattler, S.
    Khaladj, N.
    Zaruba, M. -M.
    Fischer, M.
    Hausleiter, J.
    Mehilli, J.
    Kaeaeb, S.
    Hagl, C.
    Massberg, S.
    Theiss, H. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 68 (04) : 529 - 531
  • [10] A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Myocardial Infarction
    Seyfarth, Melchior
    Sibbing, Dirk
    Bauer, Iris
    Froehlich, Georg
    Bott-Fluegel, Lorenz
    Byrne, Robert
    Dirschinger, Josef
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Schoemig, Albert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (19) : 1584 - 1588