Indirect cost of renewable energy: Insights from dispatching

被引:25
作者
Li, Jianglong [1 ]
Ho, Mun Sing [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Harvard Univ, SEAS, China Project Energy Econ & Environm, Cambridge, MA 20138 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Renewable energy; Indirect cost; Dispatching; Operating hours; Heat rate; WEAK INSTRUMENTS; FLEXIBILITY; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105778
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The rapidly falling costs of renewable energy has made them the focus of efforts in making a low-carbon transition. However, when cheap large-scale energy storage is not available, the variability of renewables implies that fossil-based technologies have to ramp up-and-down frequently to provide flexibility for matching electricity demand and supply. Here we provide a study on the indirect cost of renewable energy due to thermal efficiency loss of coal plants with such ramping requirements. Using monthly panel data for China, we show that higher renewable share is associated with fewer operating hours of coal-fired units (COHOUR). We use an instrumental variable depending on natural river flows to identify the causal effect of reduced COHOURs in raising the heat rate of coal-fired units. Specifically, a 1 percentage point increase in the share of renewables leads to a 6.4 h reduction per month, and a reduction of one COHOUR results in a 0.09 gce/kWh increase of gross heat rate (+0.03%). We estimate that the thermal efficiency loss indicates 4.77 billion US dollars of indirect cost of renewables in 2019, or 9.44 billion if we include the social cost of carbon emissions. These results indicate that we should consider the indirect impacts of renewables on total coal use and the importance of increasing flexibility of the system.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice
    Andrews, Isaiah
    Stock, James H.
    Sun, Liyang
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 11, 2019, 2019, 11 : 727 - 753
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, World Energy Outlook 2014, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264277854-EN, DOI 10.1787/WEO-2017-EN, 10.1016/0301-4215(73)90024-4, DOI 10.1016/0301-4215(73)90024-4]
  • [3] Cross-border trade in electricity
    Antweiler, Werner
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 101 : 42 - 51
  • [4] Power system flexibility: A review
    Babatunde, O. M.
    Munda, J. L.
    Hamam, Y.
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 : 101 - 106
  • [5] Why Are Power Plants in India Less Efficient than Power Plants in the United States?
    Chan, Hei Sing
    Cropper, Maureen L.
    Malik, Kabir
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (05) : 586 - 590
  • [6] Coal power flexibility, energy efficiency and pollutant emissions implications in China: A plant-level analysis based on case units
    Dong, Yuliang
    Jiang, Xu
    Liang, Zhihong
    Yuan, Jiahai
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 134 : 184 - 195
  • [7] Energy Information Agency (EIA), EL GEN WIND
  • [8] Ho M.S., 2017, China's Power Generation Dispatch
  • [9] IEA, 2020, WORLD EN BAL 2020
  • [10] Solar PV where the sun doesn't shine: Estimating the economic impacts of support schemes for residential PV with detailed net demand profiling
    La Monaca, Sarah
    Ryan, Lisa
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 108 : 731 - 741