The unified approach to the use of genomic and pedigree information in genomic evaluations revisited

被引:55
作者
Meuwissen, T. H. E. [1 ]
Luan, T. [1 ]
Woolliams, J. A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Inst Anim & Aquacultural Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Roslin Inst, Easter Bush Res Ctr, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Easter Bush Res Ctr, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
accuracy; BLUP; Genomic selection; inbreeding; relationship matrix; SNP; MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION; FULL PEDIGREE; RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; GENETIC EVALUATION; HERITABILITY; PREDICTION; ACCURACY; INVERSE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00966.x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Previous proposals for a unified approach for amalgamating information from animals with or without genotypes have combined the numerator relationship matrix A with the genomic relationship G estimated from the markers. These approaches have resulted in biased genomic EBV (GEBV), and methodology was developed to overcome these problems. Firstly, a relationship matrix, G(FG), based on linkage analysis was derived using the same base population as A, which (i) utilizes the genomic information on the same scale as the pedigree information and (ii) permits the regression coefficients used to propagate the genomic data from the genotyped to ungenotyped individuals to be calculated in the light of the genomic information, rather than ignoring it. Secondly, the elements of G were regressed back towards their expected values in the A matrix to allow for their estimation errors. These developments were combined in a methodology LDLAb and tested on simulated populations where either parents were phenotyped and offspring genotyped or vice versa. The LDLAb method was demonstrated to be a unified approach that maximized accuracy of GEBV compared to previous methodologies and removed the bias in the GEBV. Although LDLAb is computationally much more demanding than MLAC, it demonstrates how to make best use the marker information and also shows the computational problems that need to be solved in the future to make best use of the marker data.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 439
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparison of iterated single-step and Bayesian regressions on genomic evaluations for age at 100 kg in swine [J].
Freitas, M. S. ;
Freitas, L. S. ;
Weber, T. ;
Yamaki, M. ;
Cantao, M. E. ;
Peixoto, J. O. ;
Ledur, M. C. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (10) :4675-4683
[42]   Strategies for Effective Use of Genomic Information in Crop Breeding Programs Serving Africa and South Asia [J].
Santantonio, Nicholas ;
Atanda, Sikiru Adeniyi ;
Beyene, Yoseph ;
Varshney, Rajeev K. ;
Olsen, Michael ;
Jones, Elizabeth ;
Roorkiwal, Manish ;
Gowda, Manje ;
Bharadwaj, Chellapilla ;
Gaura, Pooran M. ;
Zhang, Xuecai ;
Dreher, Kate ;
Ayala-Hernandez, Claudio ;
Crossa, Jose ;
Perez-Rodriguez, Paulino ;
Rathore, Abhishek ;
Gao, Star Yanxin ;
McCouch, Susan ;
Robbins, Kelly R. .
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 11
[43]   Consequences for diversity when prioritizing animals for conservation with pedigree or genomic information [J].
Engelsma, K. A. ;
Veerkamp, R. F. ;
Calus, M. P. L. ;
Windig, J. J. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2011, 128 (06) :473-481
[44]   Scaling the genomic relationship matrix for single-step evaluation using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. [J].
Forni, S. ;
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Deeb, N. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 :532-532
[45]   Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasets [J].
Bradford, H. L. ;
Masuda, Y. ;
Cole, J. B. ;
Misztal, I ;
VanRaden, P. M. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (03) :2308-2318
[46]   Evaluation of the efficiency of genomic versus pedigree predictions for growth and wood quality traits in Scots pine [J].
Calleja-Rodriguez, Ainhoa ;
Pan, Jin ;
Funda, Tomas ;
Chen, Zhiqiang ;
Baison, John ;
Isik, Fikret ;
Abrahamsson, Sara ;
Wu, Harry X. .
BMC GENOMICS, 2020, 21 (01)
[47]   Changes in genomic predictions when new information is added [J].
Hidalgo, Jorge ;
Lourenco, Daniela ;
Tsuruta, Shogo ;
Masuda, Yutaka ;
Miller, Stephen ;
Bermann, Matias ;
Garcia, Andre L. S. ;
Misztal, Ignacy .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 (02)
[48]   Use and optimization of different sources of information for genomic prediction [J].
Ilska, Joanna J. ;
Meuwissen, Theo H. E. ;
Kranis, Andreas ;
Woolliams, John A. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2017, 49
[49]   Estimation of total genetic effects for survival time in crossbred laying hens showing cannibalism, using pedigree or genomic information [J].
Brinker, T. ;
Raymond, B. ;
Bijma, P. ;
Vereijken, A. ;
Ellen, E. D. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2017, 134 (01) :60-68
[50]   Single- and multiple-breed genomic evaluations for conformation traits in Canadian Alpine and Saanen dairy goats [J].
Massender, Erin ;
Brito, Luiz F. ;
Maignel, Laurence ;
Oliveira, Hinayah R. ;
Jafarikia, Mohsen ;
Baes, Christine F. ;
Sullivan, Brian ;
Schenkel, Flavio S. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (07) :5985-6000