Sexual functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®)

被引:102
作者
Flynn, Kathryn E. [1 ,2 ]
Jeffery, Diana D. [3 ]
Keefe, Francis J. [2 ]
Porter, Laura S. [2 ]
Shelby, Rebecca A. [4 ]
Fawzy, Maria R. [1 ]
Gosselin, Tracy K. [5 ]
Reeve, Bryce B. [6 ]
Weinfurt, Kevin P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Duke Clin Res Inst, Ctr Clin & Genet Econ, Durham, NC 27715 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC 27715 USA
[3] TRICARE Management Act, Dept Def, Ctr Hlth Care Management Studies, Hlth Program Anal & Evaluat, Falls Church, VA USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC 27715 USA
[5] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Oncol Serv, Durham, NC USA
[6] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cancer; focus groups; oncology; qualitative research; quality of life; sexual function; intimacy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROSTATE-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; IMPACT; MEN; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/pon.1738
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Cancer and treatments for cancer affect specific aspects of sexual functioning and intimacy; however, limited qualitative work has been done in diverse cancer populations. As part of an effort to improve measurement of self-reported sexual functioning, we explored the scope and importance of sexual functioning and intimacy to patients across cancer sites and along the continuum of care. Methods: We conducted 16 diagnosis- and sex-specific focus groups with patients recruited from the Duke University tumor registry and oncology/hematology clinics (N=109). A trained note taker produced field notes summarizing the discussions. An independent auditor verified field notes against written transcripts. The content of the discussions was analyzed for major themes by two independent coders. Results: Across all cancers, the most commonly discussed cancer-or treatment-related effects on sexual functioning and intimacy were fatigue, treatment-related hair loss, weight gain and organ loss or scarring. Additional barriers were unique to particular diagnoses, such as shortness of breath in lung cancer, gastrointestinal problems in colorectal cancers and incontinence in prostate cancer. Sexual functioning and intimacy were considered important to quality of life. While most effects of cancer were considered negative, many participants identified improvements to intimacy after cancer. Conclusion: Overall evaluations of satisfaction with sex life did not always correspond to specific aspects of functioning ( e. g. erectile dysfunction), presenting a challenge to researchers aiming to measure sexual functioning as an outcome. Health-care providers should not assume that level of sexual impairment determines sexual satisfaction and should explore cancer patients' sexual concerns directly. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 386
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] The impact of cancer on sexual function: a controlled study
    Ananth, H
    Jones, L
    King, M
    Tookman, A
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 17 (02) : 202 - 205
  • [2] Quality of life in head and neck cancers patients: predictive factors, functional and psychosocial outcome
    Babin, E.
    Sigston, E.
    Hitier, M.
    Dehesdin, D.
    Marie, J. P.
    Choussy, O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2008, 265 (03) : 265 - 270
  • [3] Bokhour BG, 2001, J GEN INTERN MED, V16, P649, DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00832.x
  • [4] The sexual impact of cancer and cancer treatments in men
    Bruner, Deborah Watkins
    Calvano, Tammy
    [J]. NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 42 (04) : 555 - +
  • [5] Assessing women's sexuality after cancer therapy: Checking assumptions with the focus group technique
    Bruner, DW
    Boyd, CP
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 1999, 22 (06) : 438 - 447
  • [6] BUKOVIC D, 2008, SEX DISABIL, P1
  • [7] The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years
    Cella, David
    Yount, Susan
    Rothrock, Nan
    Gershon, Richard
    Cook, Karon
    Reeve, Bryce
    Ader, Deborah
    Fries, James F.
    Bruce, Bonnie
    Rose, Mattias
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) : S3 - S11
  • [8] Dimensions of quality of life expressed by men treated for metastatic prostate cancer
    Clark, JA
    Wray, N
    Brody, B
    Ashton, C
    Giesler, B
    Watkins, H
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (08) : 1299 - 1309
  • [9] Evaluation of item candidates - The PROMIS qualitative item review
    DeWalt, Darren A.
    Rothrock, Nan
    Yount, Susan
    Stone, Arthur A.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) : S12 - S21
  • [10] Using cognitive interviews to evaluate items for measuring sexual functioning across cancer populations: improvements and remaining challenges
    Fortune-Greeley, Alice K.
    Flynn, Kathryn E.
    Jeffery, Diana D.
    Williams, Megan S.
    Keefe, Francis J.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Willis, Gordon B.
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (08) : 1085 - 1093