To Reflex or Not: Additional BRCA1/2 Testing in Ashkenazi Jewish Individuals Without Founder Mutations

被引:6
作者
Petrucelli, Nancie [1 ]
Mange, Sarah [2 ]
Fulbright, Jennifer L. [3 ]
Dohany, Lindsay [3 ]
Zakalik, Dana [3 ]
Duquette, Debra [2 ]
机构
[1] Karmanos Canc Inst, Canc Genet Counseling Serv, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Michigan Dept Community Hlth, Lifecourse Epidemiol & Genom Div, Lansing, MI USA
[3] Beaumont Hlth Syst, Canc Genet Program, Royal Oak, MI USA
关键词
BRCA1/2; Ashkenazi Jewish; Sequencing; Large rearrangement analysis; BREAST-CANCER-SUSCEPTIBILITY; POLICY STATEMENT UPDATE; HIGH-RISK; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT; PRETEST PREDICTION; FAMILIES; WOMEN; GENES; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-014-9762-z
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This study determined the prevalence of non-Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1/2 mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population in the state of Michigan, current provider testing practices, and the use of mutation probability models in determining which Ashkenazi Jewish individuals should be offered further analysis following negative BRCA1/2 founder testing. Testing patterns, mutation probabilities, and testing results were assessed for 327 Ashkenazi Jewish individuals seen for BRCA1/2 counseling in the state of Michigan who underwent testing for the Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations. Only one (0.6 %) Ashkenazi Jewish individual with sequencing after negative founder analysis was found to have a non-founder mutation; no rearrangements were identified. Testing patterns varied by clinic, with the proportion of Ashkenazi Jewish individuals undergoing additional sequencing ranging from 22.2 to 92.9 %. In Ashkenazi Jewish individuals with a pre-test BRCAPRO risk calculation, the mean risk was significantly higher in those with follow-up sequencing compared to those who did not pursue additional testing. The low prevalence of non-founder BRCA1/2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals does not warrant automatically reflexing to full analysis after negative mutation testing. Increased use of mutation probability models may aid in determining which cases warrant additional testing.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 293
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Head and Neck Cancers NCCN Guidelines
[2]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[3]   Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility:: Recommendation statement [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Calonge, N ;
Frame, PS ;
Gordis, L ;
Gregory, KD ;
Harris, R ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Loveland-Cherry, C ;
Moyer, VA ;
Ockene, JK ;
Petitti, DB ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Yawn, BP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 143 (05) :355-361
[4]   BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes [J].
Berry, DA ;
Iversen, ES ;
Gudbjartsson, DF ;
Hiller, EH ;
Garber, JE ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Lerman, C ;
Watson, P ;
Lynch, HT ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Hughes, KS ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (11) :2701-2712
[5]   American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility [J].
Bruinooge, SS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (12) :2397-2406
[6]   BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer [J].
Couch, FJ ;
DeShano, ML ;
Blackwood, MA ;
Calzone, K ;
Stopfer, J ;
Campeau, L ;
Ganguly, A ;
Rebbeck, T ;
Weber, BL ;
Jablon, L ;
Cobleigh, MA ;
Hoskins, K ;
Garber, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (20) :1409-1415
[7]   Pre-test prediction models of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in breast/ovarian families attending familial cancer clinics [J].
de la Hoya, M ;
Díez, O ;
Pérez-Segura, P ;
Godino, J ;
Fernández, JM ;
Sanz, J ;
Alonso, C ;
Baiget, M ;
Díaz-Rubio, E ;
Caldés, T .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2003, 40 (07) :503-510
[8]   Analysis of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes' contribution to breast cancer susceptibility in high risk Jewish Ashkenazi women [J].
Distelman-Menachem, Tal ;
Shapira, Tal ;
Laitman, Yael ;
Kaufman, Bella ;
Barak, Frida ;
Tavtigian, Sean ;
Friedman, Eitan .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2009, 8 (02) :127-133
[9]   Cancer risks in two large breast cancer families linked to BRCA2 on chromosome 13q12-13 [J].
Easton, DF ;
Steele, L ;
Fields, P ;
Ormiston, W ;
Averill, D ;
Daly, PA ;
McManus, R ;
Neuhausen, SL ;
Ford, D ;
Wooster, R ;
CannonAlbright, LA ;
Stratton, MR ;
Goldgar, DE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1997, 61 (01) :120-128
[10]   Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO [J].
Euhus, DM ;
Smith, KC ;
Robinson, L ;
Stucky, A ;
Olopade, OI ;
Cummings, S ;
Garber, JE ;
Chittenden, A ;
Mills, GB ;
Rieger, P ;
Esserman, L ;
Crawford, B ;
Hughes, KS ;
Roche, CA ;
Ganz, PA ;
Seldon, J ;
Fabian, CJ ;
Klemp, J ;
Tomlinson, G .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2002, 94 (11) :844-851