Community Engagement in Research: Frameworks for Education and Peer Review

被引:305
作者
Ahmed, Syed M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Palermo, Ann-Gel S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Family & Community Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Populat Hlth, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Ctr Healthy Communities, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[4] New York Acad Med, Harlem Community & Acad Partnership, Ctr Urban Epidemiol Studies, New York, NY USA
[5] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Ctr Multicultural & Community Affairs, New York, NY USA
关键词
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; HEALTH; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Community engagement in research may enhance a community's ability to address its own health needs and health disparities issues while ensuring that researchers understand community priorities. However, there are researchers with limited understanding of andexperience with effective methods of engaging communities. Furthermore, limited guidance is available for peer-review panels on evaluating proposals for research that engages communities. The National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives developed a community engagement framework that includes values, strategies to operationalize each value, and potential outcomes of their use, as well as a peer-review framework for evaluating research that engages communities. Use of these frameworks for educating researchers to create and sustain authentic community-academic partnerships will increase accountability and equality betweenthe partners.
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1387
页数:8
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   NIH invites activists into the inner sanctum [J].
Agnew, B .
SCIENCE, 1999, 283 (5410) :1999-2001
[2]  
Ahmed Syed M, 2004, Educ Health (Abingdon), V17, P141, DOI 10.1080/13576280410001710969
[3]  
*AM PUBL HLTH ASS, SUPP COMM BAS PART R
[4]   Research expectations among African American church leaders in the PRAISE! project: A randomized trial guided by community-based participatory research [J].
Ammerman, A ;
Corbie-Smith, G ;
St George, DMM ;
Washington, C ;
Weathers, B ;
Jackson-Christian, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (10) :1720-1727
[5]   Benefits and drawbacks of including consumer reviewers in the scientific merit review of breast cancer research [J].
Andejeski, Y ;
Breslau, ES ;
Hart, E ;
Lythcott, N ;
Alexander, L ;
Rich, I ;
Bisceglio, I ;
Smith, HS ;
Visco, FM .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2002, 11 (02) :119-136
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, EMPOWERMENT EVALUATI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EVIDENCE REPORTTECHN
[8]  
[Anonymous], ENV JUST COMM BAS PA
[9]  
[Anonymous], PROACTIVE MANAGEMENT
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Principles of community engagement