Impact assessment of faecal sludge on groundwater and river water quality in Lucknow environs, Uttar Pradesh, India

被引:23
|
作者
Singh, Shubhra [1 ]
Hariteja, N. [2 ]
Prasad, T. J. Renuka [1 ]
Raju, N. Janardhana [3 ]
Ramakrishna, Ch [4 ]
机构
[1] Bangalore Univ, Dept Geol, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[3] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Sch Environm Sci, New Delhi, India
[4] GITAM Univ, Dept Environm Studies, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Faecal sludge; Groundwater; River water; Water quality index; Multivariate statistical analysis; HEAVY-METAL CONTAMINATION; DISTRICT; CHEMISTRY; BASIN; IDENTIFICATION; HYDROCHEMISTRY; MANAGEMENT; POLLUTION; VARANASI; KAMPALA;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100461
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The present study aims at Faecal Sludge (FS) characterization and assessing water quality impacted due to waste dumping in one of the India's most polluted cities, Lucknow. In order to accomplish the objective; FS, groundwater and river water were sampled from the study area in the post monsoon season. Ground water and river water data were assessed by using Piper diagram, Gibbs' diagram, Water Quality Index (WQI), Wilcox's diagram, US Salinity Laboratory's(USSL) diagram and multivariate statistical analysis. The study reveals that FS sample contains considerable amounts of electrical conductivity, cations and anions. Piper diagram demonstrates that dominance of the anions is mainly HCO3 in groundwater and river water. Whereas, Gibbs' diagram depicts that the chief source of soluble ions is weathering of rocks over which water flows. The ground water samples were grouped into excellent, good and poor while river water samples were grouped as good, poor, very poor and unsuitable for drinking as per WQI. Wilcox and USSL diagram indicated the majority of the samples are suitable for irrigation in groundwater and river water. Major Principal Components (PCs) have been identified by principal component analysis for groundwater and river water that explained 76% and 85% of the total variance in the dataset, respectively. PC1, PC2, PC3 and PC4 reflect the weathering, weathering along with anthropogenic, geochemical and anthropogenic component in groundwater, respectively. While for river water, PC1, PC2 and PC3 indicate mineral, anthropogenic and hardness component, respectively. Hierarchical cluster analysis depicts three types of cluster for groundwater and two types of cluster for river water samples based on the similarities in chemical composition. The study signifies that open dumping of waste is influencing the groundwater quality in solid waste disposal&slum area while pollution load of river water in downstream is increasing due to discharge of effluent.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN RIVER HINDON CATCHMENT OF SAHARANPUR, UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA
    Kumar, Amrish
    Bharti
    Dutt, Dharm
    Kumar, Vivek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 15 (01): : 415 - 421
  • [2] Assessment of spatial and temporal variations in water quality by the application of multivariate statistical methods in the Kali River, Uttar Pradesh, India
    Singh, Gaurav
    Patel, Neelam
    Jindal, Tanu
    Srivastava, Prateek
    Bhowmik, Arpan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 192 (06)
  • [3] Groundwater quality in Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh, India: Multivariate and health risk assessment
    Chabukdhara, Mayuri
    Gupta, Sanjay Kumar
    Kotecha, Yatharth
    Nema, Arvind K.
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2017, 179 : 167 - 178
  • [4] Groundwater Quality in the Lower Varuna River Basin, Varanasi District, Uttar Pradesh
    Raju, N. Janardhana
    Ram, Prahlad
    Dey, Sangita
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2009, 73 (02) : 178 - 192
  • [5] Assessment of the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the heavy metal pollution in the River Gomti, Lucknow city, Uttar Pradesh, India
    Khan, Ramsha
    Saxena, Abhishek
    Shukla, Saurabh
    ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 31 (04) : 41 - 49
  • [6] Impact of rapid urbanization on water quality index in groundwater fed Gomati River, Lucknow, India
    Goel, Pooja
    Saxena, Abhishek
    Sen Singh, Dhruv
    Verma, Deepti
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2018, 114 (03): : 650 - 654
  • [7] Hydrogeochemistry for the assessment of groundwater quality in Varanasi: a fast-urbanizing center in Uttar Pradesh, India
    Raju, Nandimandalam Janardhana
    Shukla, U. K.
    Ram, Prahlad
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2011, 173 (1-4) : 279 - 300
  • [8] Metal distribution in the sediments, water and naturally occurring macrophytes in the river Gomti, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
    Neha
    Kumar, Dhananjay
    Shukla, Preeti
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Bauddh, Kuldeep
    Tiwari, Jaya
    Dwivedi, Neetu
    Barman, S. C.
    Singh, D. P.
    Kumar, Narendra
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2017, 113 (08): : 1578 - 1585
  • [9] Groundwater Quality assessment using Water Quality Index (WQI) in parts of Varanasi District, Uttar Pradesh, India
    Chaurasia, Abhishek Kumar
    Pandey, H. K.
    Tiwari, S. K.
    Prakash, Ram
    Pandey, Prashant
    Ram, Arjun
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2018, 92 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [10] Potential impact of rainfall variability on groundwater resources: a case study in Uttar Pradesh, India
    Dey, Sangita
    Bhatt, Diva
    Haq, Saidul
    Mall, Rajesh Kumar
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (03)