Facilitating Clinical Outcomes Assessment through the automated identification of quality measures for prostate cancer surgery

被引:13
作者
D'Avouo, Leona W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Litwin, Mark S. [4 ,5 ]
Roges, Selwyn O., Jr. [6 ]
Bui, Alex A. T. [7 ]
机构
[1] Vet Adm Hosp, MAVERIC, Boston, MA USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Grad Program Hlth Informat, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Bouve Coll Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Imaging Informat Grp, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1197/jamia.M2649
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objectives: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) Category 1 quality measures, tumor stage Gleason score, and surgical margin status, are used by physicians and cancer registrars to categorize patients into groups for clinical trials and treatment planning. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an application designed to automatically extract these quality measures from the postoperative pathology reports of patients having undergone prostatectomies for treatment of prostate cancer. Design: An application was developed with the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Toolkit that uses an information pipeline of regular expressions and support vector machines to extract CAP Category 1 quality measures. System performance was evaluated against a gold standard of 676 pathology reports from the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center and Brigham and Women's Hospital. To evaluate the feasibility of clinical implementation, all pathology reports were gathered using administrative codes with no manual preprocessing of the data performed. Measurements: The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of system performance were measured for all three quality measures. Performance at both hospitals was compared, and a detailed failure analysis was conducted to identify errors caused by poor data quality versus system shortcomings. Results: Accuracies for Gleason score were 99.7%, tumor stage 99.1%, and margin status 97.2%, for an overall accuracy of 98.67%. System performance on data from both hospitals was comparable. Poor clinical data quality led to a decrease in overall accuracy of only 0.3% but accounted for 25.9% of the total errors. Conclusion: Despite differences in document format and pathologists' reporting styles, strong system performance indicates the potential of using a combination of regular expressions and support vector machines to automatically extract CAP Category 1 quality measures from postoperative prostate cancer pathology reports.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 348
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   The urgent need to improve health care quality - Institute of medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality [J].
Chassin, MR ;
Galvin, RW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :1000-1005
[12]   Uniqueness of medical data mining [J].
Cios, KJ ;
Moore, GW .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 26 (1-2) :1-24
[13]   The Clinical Outcomes Assessment Toolkit: A framework to support automated clinical records-based outcomes assessment and performance measurement research [J].
D'Avolio, Leonard W. ;
Bui, Alex A. T. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2008, 15 (03) :333-340
[14]   Application of recently developed computer algorithm for automatic classification of unstructured radiology reports: Validation study [J].
Dreyer, KJ ;
Kalra, MK ;
Maher, MM ;
Hurier, AM ;
Asfaw, BA ;
Schultz, T ;
Halpern, EF ;
Thrall, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) :323-329
[15]  
Fowles J B, 1998, J Ambul Care Manage, V21, P24
[16]   A GENERAL NATURAL-LANGUAGE TEXT PROCESSOR FOR CLINICAL RADIOLOGY [J].
FRIEDMAN, C ;
ALDERSON, PO ;
AUSTIN, JHM ;
CIMINO, JJ ;
JOHNSON, SB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1994, 1 (02) :161-174
[17]  
Greene FL., 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING HD, V6th
[18]   Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients [J].
Hull, GW ;
Rabbani, F ;
Abbas, F ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Kattan, MW ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) :528-534
[19]  
*I MED, 2005, ASS QUAL CANC CAR AP
[20]   Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries - A profile at state and national levels [J].
Jencks, SF ;
Cuerdon, T ;
Burwen, DR ;
Fleming, B ;
Houck, PM ;
Kussmaul, AE ;
Nilasena, DS ;
Ordin, DL ;
Arday, DR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (13) :1670-1676