Improving Building Performance Using Smart Building Concept: Benefit Cost Ratio Comparison

被引:9
作者
Berawi, Mohammed Ali [1 ]
Miraj, Perdana [2 ,3 ]
Sayuti, Mustika Sari [3 ]
Berawi, Abdur Rohim Boy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn, Depok 16424, Indonesia
[2] Univ Pancasila, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn, Jakarta 12640, Indonesia
[3] Univ Indonesia, Ctr Sustainable Infrastruct Dev, Fac Engn, Depok 16424, Indonesia
来源
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING ENGINEERING (ICONBUILD 2017) | 2017年 / 1903卷
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.5011508
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Smart building concept is an implementation of technology developed in the construction industry throughout the world. However, the implementation of this concept is still below expectations due to various obstacles such as higher initial cost than a conventional concept and existing regulation siding with the lowest cost in the tender process. This research aims to develop intelligent building concept using value engineering approach to obtain added value regarding quality, efficiency, and innovation. The research combined quantitative and qualitative approach using questionnaire survey and value engineering method to achieve the research objectives. The research output will show additional functions regarding technology innovation that may increase the value of a building. This study shows that smart building concept requires higher initial cost, but produces lower operational and maintenance costs. Furthermore, it also confirms that benefit-cost ratio on the smart building was much higher than a conventional building, that is 1.99 to 0.88.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IJTECH
[2]  
[Anonymous], INTEGRATION NATURE T
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ARCHIT SCI REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, BOOK BIM HDB GUIDE B
[5]   Producing alternative concept for the Trans-Sumatera toll road project development using location quotient method [J].
Berawi, Mohammed Ali ;
Zagloel, Teuku Yuri ;
Miraj, Perdana ;
Mulyanto, Hadi .
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS - SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURES FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, 2017, 171 :265-273
[6]  
Cho M. C. T., 2000, Facilities, V18, P225, DOI 10.1108/02632770010328072
[7]  
Clemence A., 2014, QUANTITATIVE ANAL SO
[8]   Editorial [J].
Clements-Croome, Derek .
INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 3 (01) :3-4
[9]  
Fellows R.F., 2015, RES METHODS CONSTRUC
[10]  
Mertens D.M., 2014, Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods