Protecting Animal Welfare in Animal-Assisted Intervention: Our Ethical Obligation

被引:8
作者
Fine, Aubrey H. [1 ]
Griffin, Taylor Chastain [2 ]
机构
[1] CA Poly State Univ, Coll Educ & Integrat Studies, Dept Educ, 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 USA
[2] Pet Partners, Bellevue, WA USA
关键词
animal-assisted therapy; animal welfare; therapy animals; ethics in AAI; HEALTH-CARE; PET DOGS; THERAPY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1742099
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
When incorporating therapy animals into clinical practice, there are essential ethical considerations that must be considered to protect the welfare of both the people and the animals who are involved in the intervention. The field of animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) and more specifically animal-assisted therapy (AAT) is just beginning to appreciate the critical role that animal welfare has in enhancing the quality of the entire process of working with a therapy animal. In this article, the authors will present ethical models that are incumbent for practitioners to consider prior to partnering with a therapy animal. Examples of how a speech-language pathologist (SLP) might work with a therapy animal will be integrated throughout the article to demonstrate applied awareness of how good welfare not only protects the animal but also the clients who engage in the intervention. Key aspects to consider at all stages of AAT will be described, including considerations of welfare as they relate to selecting and working with a therapy animal, preparing clients for AAT, and developing specific competencies as an AAT practitioner. Theoretical support for these recommendations will also be outlined, preparing AAT providers to not only incorporate the highest standards in AAT but to also serve as an advocate in championing these standards as the field develops.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 23
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Terminology
  • [2] Bremhorst A., 2021, The Welfare of Animals in Animal-Assisted Interventions
  • [3] Efficacy of Dog Training With and Without Remote Electronic Collars vs. a Focus on Positive Reinforcement
    China, Lucy
    Mills, Daniel S.
    Cooper, Jonathan J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [4] Cochrane A., 2010, UTILITARIANISM ANIMA
  • [5] Fejsakova M., 2009, Folia Veterinaria, V53, P62
  • [6] Fine A., 2016, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, V2nd, P68, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00120-8, 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00120-8]
  • [7] Fine A.H., 2019, HDB ANIMAL ASSISTED, P23, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-12-815395-6.00003-1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-815395-6.00003-1, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815395-6.00003-1]
  • [8] Francione GL.., 2003, ONLINE J STUDY PHILO, V13, DOI [10.15368/bts.2003v13n3.5, DOI 10.15368/BTS.2003V13N3.5]
  • [9] Fraser D, 1997, ANIM WELFARE, V6, P187
  • [10] Fredrickson-MacNamara M, 2010, HANDBOOK ON ANIMAL-ASSISTED THERAPY: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR PRACTICE, 3RD EDITION, P111, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10007-8