Emergency and urgent care systems in Australia, Denmark, England, France, Germany and the Netherlands - Analyzing organization, payment and reforms

被引:78
作者
Baier, Natalie [1 ]
Geissler, Alexander [1 ]
Bech, Mickael [2 ,3 ]
Bernstein, David
Cowling, Thomas E. [4 ,5 ]
Jackson, Terri [6 ]
van Manen, Johan [7 ]
Rudkjobing, Andreas [8 ]
Quentin, Wilm [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Berlin Ctr Hlth Econ Res BerlinHECOR, Dept Hlth Care Management, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Bartholins Alle 7, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Imperial Coll London, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London SW7 2AZ, England
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England
[6] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Inst Appl Econ & Social Res, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[7] Dutch Hlth Author, Postbus 3017, NL-3502 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Norregade 10, DK-1165 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Emergency services; Ambulatory care; Health care reforms; Comparative research; IMPACT; SERVICES; PERSPECTIVES; DEPARTMENTS; PROVISION; DELIVERY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Increasing numbers of hospital emergency department (ED) visits pose a challenge to health systems in many countries. This paper aims to examine emergency and urgent care systems, in six countries and to identify reform trends in response to current challenges. Methods: Based on a literature review, six countries - Australia, Denmark, England, France, Germany and the Netherlands - were selected for analysis. Information was collected using a standardized questionnaire that was completed by national experts. These experts reviewed relevant policy documents and provided information on (1) the organization and planning of emergency and urgent care, (2) payment systems for EDs and urgent primary care providers, and (3) reform initiatives. Results: In the six countries four main reform approaches could be identified: (a) extending the availability of urgent primary care, (b) concentrating and centralizing the provision of urgent primary care, (c) improving coordination between urgent primary care and emergency care, and (d) concentrating emergency care provision at fewer institutions. The design of payment systems for urgent primary care and for emergency care is often aligned to support these reforms. Conclusion: Better guidance of patients and a reconfiguration of emergency and urgent care are the most important measures taken to address the current challenges. Nationwide planning of all emergency care providers, closely coordinated reforms and informing patients can support future reforms. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
ACEM, 2014, POL STAND TERM
[2]  
ACEM, 2012, STAT DECL EM DEP
[3]  
AIHW, 2015, AUSTR HOSP STAT 2013
[4]  
AIHW, 2015, AUSTR HOSP STAT ADM
[5]  
AIHW, 2015, AUSTR HOSP STAT HOSP
[6]  
Al-Shaqsi Sultan, 2010, Oman Med J, V25, P320, DOI 10.5001/omj.2010.92
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LOC ALG AC ZIEK
[8]   Impact of a GP-led walk-in centre on NHS emergency departments [J].
Arain, M. ;
Campbell, M. J. ;
Nicholl, J. P. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2015, 32 (04) :295-300
[9]   How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials [J].
Asplund, K ;
Berman, P ;
Blomstrand, C ;
Dennis, M ;
Erila, T ;
Garraway, M ;
Hamrin, E ;
Hankey, G ;
Ilmavirta, M ;
Indredavik, B ;
Kalra, L ;
Kaste, M ;
Langhorne, P ;
Rodgers, H ;
Sivenius, J ;
Slattery, J ;
Stevens, R ;
Svensson, A ;
Warlow, C ;
Williams, B ;
WoodDauphinee, S ;
Deleo, D ;
Drummond, A ;
Fogelholm, R ;
Lincoln, N ;
Palomaki, H ;
Strand, T ;
Wilhelmsen, L ;
Counsell, C ;
Fraser, H .
STROKE, 1997, 28 (11) :2139-2144
[10]  
Berchet C, 2015, EMERGENCY CARE SERVI