Inversion based on computational simulations

被引:0
作者
Hanson, KM [1 ]
Cunningham, GS [1 ]
Saquib, SS [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
来源
MAXIMUM ENTROPY AND BAYESIAN METHODS | 1998年 / 98卷
关键词
simulation; inversion; reconstruction; adjoint differentiation; sensitivity analysis; optimization; model validation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
A standard approach to solving inversion problems that involve many parameters uses gradient-based optimization to find the parameters that best match the data. We will discuss enabling techniques that facilitate application of this approach to large-scale computational simulations, which are the only way to investigate many complex physical phenomena. Such simulations may not seem to lend themselves to calculation of the gradient with respect to numerous parameters. However, adjoint differentiation allows one to efficiently compute the gradient of an objective function with respect to all the variables of a simulation. When combined with advanced gradient-based optimization algorithms, adjoint differentiation permits one to solve very large problems of optimization or parameter estimation. These techniques will be illustrated through the simulation of the time-dependent diffusion of infrared light through tissue, which has been used to perform optical tomography. The techniques discussed have a wide range of applicability to modeling including the optimization of models to achieve a desired design goal.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 135
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Depth Optimization of FLT-Based Quantum Inversion Circuit
    Larasati, Harashta Tatimma
    Putranto, Dedy Septono Catur
    Wardhani, Rini Wisnu
    Park, Jonguk
    Kim, Howon
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 54910 - 54927
  • [2] Development of computational inversion techniques to size cracks from eddy current signals
    Yusa, Noritaka
    NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2009, 24 (1-2) : 39 - 52
  • [3] Overview of computational simulations for PDT treatments based on optimal choice of singlet oxygen
    Beeson, Karl
    Parilov, Evgueni
    Potasek, Mary
    OPTICAL METHODS FOR TUMOR TREATMENT AND DETECTION: MECHANISMS AND TECHNIQUES IN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY XXVI, 2017, 10047
  • [4] How you can tell if the simulations in computational criminology are any good
    Berk R.
    Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2008, 4 (3) : 289 - 308
  • [5] Reproducibility in Computational Neuroscience Models and Simulations
    McDougal, Robert A.
    Bulanova, Anna S.
    Lytton, William W.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 63 (10) : 2021 - 2035
  • [6] Phantom-based experimental validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations on cerebral aneurysms
    Sun, Qi
    Groth, Alexandra
    Bertram, Matthias
    Waechter, Irina
    Bruijns, Tom
    Hermans, Roel
    Aach, Til
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (09) : 5054 - 5065
  • [7] Computational techniques for optimization of problems involving non-linear transient simulations
    Galarza, GA
    Carrera, J
    Medina, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1999, 45 (03) : 319 - 334
  • [8] Gradient-based shape optimization for unsteady turbulent simulations using field inversion and machine learning
    Fidkowski, Krzysztof J.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 129
  • [9] Simulations of a Computational Model for a Virtual Medical Assistant
    Jackson, Aryana Collins
    Gilles, Marlene
    Wall, Eimear
    Bevacqua, Elisabetta
    De Loor, Pierre
    Querrec, Ronan
    ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - VOL 1, 2022, : 94 - 105
  • [10] Acceptance sampling to aid in the verification of computational simulations
    Collins, Andrew J.
    Frydenlund, Erika
    Lynch, Christopher J.
    Robinson, R. Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODELING SIMULATION AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2022, 13 (06)