How does Germany's green energy policy affect electricity market volatility? An application of conditional autoregressive range models

被引:27
作者
Auer, Benjamin R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Dept Finance, Grimma Str 12, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
[2] CESifo Munich, Res Network Area Macro Money & Int Finance, Schackstr 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
关键词
German energy policy; Electricity markets; EEX data; CARR modelling; UNIT-ROOT TEST; REGIME-SWITCHING MODELS; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; SPOT PRICES; WIND; CONSUMPTION; INTEGRATION; GENERATION; SCHEMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on a dynamic model for the high/low range of electricity prices, this article analyses the effects of Germany's green energy policy on the volatility of the electricity market. Using European Energy Exchange data from 2000 to 2015, we find rather high volatility in the years 2000-2009 but also that the weekly price range has significantly declined in the period following the year 2009. This period is characterised by active regulation under the Energy Industry Law (EnWG), the EU Emissions Trading Directive (ETD) and the Renewable Energy Law (EEG). In contrast to the preceding period, price jumps are smaller and less frequent (especially for day-time hours), implying that current policy measures are effective in promoting renewable energies while simultaneously upholding electricity market stability. This is because the regulations strive towards a more and more flexible and market-oriented structure which allows better integration of renewable energies and supports an efficient alignment of renewable electricity supply with demand. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 628
页数:8
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   Electricity price forecasting in deregulated markets: A review and evaluation [J].
Aggarwal, Sanjeev Kumar ;
Saini, Lalit Mohan ;
Kumar, Ashwani .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2009, 31 (01) :13-22
[2]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[3]   A range-based volatility approach to measuring volatility contagion in securitized real estate markets [J].
Anderson, Randy I. ;
Chen, Yi-Chi ;
Wang, Li-Min .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2015, 45 :223-235
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Quantitative Energy Finance, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7248-3_2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7248-3], Patent No. 012014
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Financ. Econ.
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Modeling and Forecasting Electricity Loads and Prices: A Statistical Approach
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Appl Math Finance, DOI DOI 10.1080/13504860500117503
[8]   Structural breaks and petroleum consumption in US states: Are shocks transitory or permanent? [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (10) :6375-6378
[9]   Is gold a safe haven? International evidence [J].
Baur, Dirk G. ;
McDermott, Thomas K. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (08) :1886-1898
[10]   VARIANCES OF SECURITY PRICE RETURNS BASED ON HIGH, LOW, AND CLOSING PRICES [J].
BECKERS, S .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1983, 56 (01) :97-112