Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Urethral Margin Biopsies During Radical Prostatectomy

被引:16
作者
Ye, Huihui
Kong, Xiangtian
He, Tian Wei
Jolis, Timothy
Choi, Kenneth
Lepor, Herbert
Melamed, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; SOFT-TISSUE MARGINS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PATHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; APICAL DISSECTION; IMPACT; CANCER; PROGRESSION; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the accuracy and potential clinical value of intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) on urethral margin (UM) tissue during radical prostatectomy. Positive surgical margins increase the risk of post-operative cancer recurrence. Positive surgical margins are frequently found at the apex. The utility of intraoperative FSA of the margins is controversial. METHODS We reviewed a consecutive series of radical prostatectomy cases (n = 1669) performed at our institution, in which UMs were routinely evaluated by intraoperative FSA. RESULTS The submitted UM tissue contained cancer glands in 111 cases (6.7%). On FSA, the pathologists detected cancer in 55 cases (3.3%), missed cancer in 38 (2.3%), and reported atypical glands in 18 (1.1%). FSA of the UMs had a sensitivity of 59.1%, specificity of 99.8%, and positive and negative predictive value of 94.8% and 97.6%, respectively. The low sensitivity resulted from a substantial false-negative rate (n = 38), which was largely attributed to limited sampling on FSA (n = 31). Of the 55 patients (3.3%) whose positive UMs were detected by FSA, 20 (1.2%) had cancer-free margins after tissue re-excision. A positive final UM was associated with greater biochemical recurrence (P = .0073). However, the few patients limited the statistical analysis of the benefit of margin conversion through tissue re-excision (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS Although experienced pathologists can evaluate the UMs on FSA with good accuracy, FSA has a relatively low sensitivity. Our data have indicated a low yield and a questionable value of routine FSA during radical prostatectomy. UROLOGY 78: 399-404, 2011. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 404
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of frozen section analysis of surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 2608-case experience
    Kakiuchi, Yasuhiro
    Choy, Bonnie
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    Izumi, Koji
    Wu, Guan
    Rashid, Hani
    Joseph, Jean V.
    Miyamoto, Hiroshi
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 44 (08) : 1556 - 1562
  • [22] Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section
    Tully, Karl H.
    Schulmeyer, Max
    Hanske, Julian
    Reike, Moritz J.
    Brock, Marko
    Moritz, Rudolf
    Juette, Hendrik
    Tannapfel, Andrea
    von Bodman, Christian
    Noldus, Joachim
    Palisaar, Rein-Jueri
    Roghmann, Florian
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 (05) : 598 - 606
  • [23] An intraoperative nomogram for predicting secondary margin positivity in breast conserving surgery utilizing frozen section analysis
    Li, Cheng
    Jiang, Yan
    Wu, Xumiao
    Luo, Yong
    Li, Qi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 14
  • [24] Evaluatoion of intraoperative histology during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Kotov, S. V.
    Byadretdinov, I. S.
    Guspanov, R. I.
    Pulbere, S. A.
    Yusufov, A. G.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2023, 19 (04): : 52 - 60
  • [25] The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nguyen, Laura N.
    Head, Linden
    Witiuk, Kelsey
    Punjani, Nahid
    Mallick, Ranjeeta
    Cnossen, Sonya
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Cagiannos, Ilias
    Lavallee, Luke T.
    Morash, Christopher
    Breau, Rodney H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (04) : 760 - 769
  • [26] Preoperative and Intraoperative Measurements of Urethral Length as Predictors of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Hakimi, A. Ari
    Faleck, David M.
    Agalliu, Ilir
    Rozenblit, Alla M.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Ghavamian, Reza
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (06) : 1025 - 1030
  • [27] Impact of positive surgical margin location after radical prostatectomy: a network meta-analysis
    John, Athul
    Milton, Thomas
    Gupta, Aashray
    Nguyen, Mau T.
    Stretton, Brandon
    Hewitt, Joseph
    Virgin, James
    Kovoor, Joshua
    Catterwell, Rick
    Selth, Luke
    Callaghan, Michael O.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 43 (01)
  • [28] Feasibility of Diffuse Reflection Spectroscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment During Prostatectomy
    de Roode, Lotte M.
    de Boer, Lisanne L.
    Guimaraes, Marcos Da Silva
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Dashtbozorg, Behdad
    Ruers, Theo J. M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 67 : 62 - 68
  • [29] Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Multiparametric MR Imaging-directed Intraoperative Frozen-Section Analysis to Reduce the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    Musi, Gennaro
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Summers, Paul
    Renne, Giuseppe
    Alessi, Sarah
    Raimondi, Sara
    Matei, Deliu V.
    Renne, Salvatore L.
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara A.
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Bellomi, Massimo
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (02) : 434 - 444
  • [30] Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome
    Georgios Hatzichristodoulou
    Stefan Wagenpfeil
    Gregor Weirich
    Michael Autenrieth
    Tobias Maurer
    Mark Thalgott
    Thomas Horn
    Matthias Heck
    Kathleen Herkommer
    Jürgen E. Gschwend
    Hubert Kübler
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 229 - 236