Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Urethral Margin Biopsies During Radical Prostatectomy

被引:16
|
作者
Ye, Huihui
Kong, Xiangtian
He, Tian Wei
Jolis, Timothy
Choi, Kenneth
Lepor, Herbert
Melamed, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; SOFT-TISSUE MARGINS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PATHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; APICAL DISSECTION; IMPACT; CANCER; PROGRESSION; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the accuracy and potential clinical value of intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) on urethral margin (UM) tissue during radical prostatectomy. Positive surgical margins increase the risk of post-operative cancer recurrence. Positive surgical margins are frequently found at the apex. The utility of intraoperative FSA of the margins is controversial. METHODS We reviewed a consecutive series of radical prostatectomy cases (n = 1669) performed at our institution, in which UMs were routinely evaluated by intraoperative FSA. RESULTS The submitted UM tissue contained cancer glands in 111 cases (6.7%). On FSA, the pathologists detected cancer in 55 cases (3.3%), missed cancer in 38 (2.3%), and reported atypical glands in 18 (1.1%). FSA of the UMs had a sensitivity of 59.1%, specificity of 99.8%, and positive and negative predictive value of 94.8% and 97.6%, respectively. The low sensitivity resulted from a substantial false-negative rate (n = 38), which was largely attributed to limited sampling on FSA (n = 31). Of the 55 patients (3.3%) whose positive UMs were detected by FSA, 20 (1.2%) had cancer-free margins after tissue re-excision. A positive final UM was associated with greater biochemical recurrence (P = .0073). However, the few patients limited the statistical analysis of the benefit of margin conversion through tissue re-excision (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS Although experienced pathologists can evaluate the UMs on FSA with good accuracy, FSA has a relatively low sensitivity. Our data have indicated a low yield and a questionable value of routine FSA during radical prostatectomy. UROLOGY 78: 399-404, 2011. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 404
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraoperative Frozen Section for Margin Evaluation During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review
    Dinneen, Eoin P.
    Van Der Slot, Michelle
    Adasonla, Kelvin
    Tan, Jin
    Grierson, Jack
    Haider, Aiman
    Freeman, Alex
    Oakley, Neil
    Shaw, Greg
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (04): : 664 - 673
  • [2] Value of frozen section biopsies during radical prostatectomy: significance of the histological results
    Ramirez-Backhaus, Miguel
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Jain, Sunjay
    Do, Minh
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Ganzer, Roman
    Horn, Lars-Christian
    Burchardt, Martin
    Jimenez-Cruz, Fernando
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 27 (02) : 227 - 234
  • [3] Intraoperative margin assessment during radical prostatectomy: is microscopy frozen in time or ready for digital defrost?
    Dinneen, Eoin
    Almeida-Magana, Ricardo
    Al-Hammouri, Tarek
    Fernandes, Iona
    Mayor, Nikhil
    Mendes, Larissa
    Winkler, Mathias
    Silvanto, Anna
    Haider, Aiman
    Freeman, Alex
    Shaw, Greg
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2024, 85 (05) : 716 - 726
  • [4] Intraoperative frozen section assessment of pelvic lymph nodes during radical prostatectomy is of limited value
    Song, Jie
    Li, Mei
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    Taxy, Jerome B.
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (10) : 1463 - 1467
  • [5] Intraoperative Frozen Section of the Prostate Decreases Positive Margin Rate While Ensuring Nerve Sparing Procedure During Radical Prostatectomy
    von Bodman, Christian
    Brock, Marko
    Roghmann, Florian
    Byers, Anne
    Loeppenberg, Bjoern
    Braun, Katharina
    Pastor, Jobst
    Sommerer, Florian
    Noldus, Joachim
    Palisaar, Rein Jueri
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) : 515 - 520
  • [6] Clinical impact of intraoperative frozen sections during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Heinrich, Elmar
    Schoen, Georg
    Schiefelbein, Frank
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    Trojan, Lutz
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (06) : 709 - 713
  • [7] Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Gillitzer, Rolf
    Thueroff, Carolin
    Fandel, Thomas
    Thomas, Christian
    Thueroff, Joachim W.
    Brenner, Walburgis
    Wiesner, Christoph
    Jones, Jon
    Hansen, Torsten
    Hampel, Christian
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (05) : 755 - 759
  • [8] The Use of Augmented Reality to Guide the Intraoperative Frozen Section During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Chessa, Francesco
    Angiolini, Andrea
    Cercenelli, Laura
    Lodi, Simone
    Bortolani, Barbara
    Molinaroli, Enrico
    Casablanca, Carlo
    Droghetti, Matteo
    Gaudiano, Caterina
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Porreca, Angelo
    Golfieri, Rita
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Giunchi, Francesca
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Piazza, Pietro
    Puliatti, Stefano
    Diciotti, Stefano
    Marcelli, Emanuela
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (04) : 480 - 488
  • [9] Indications for intraoperative frozen section in robot assisted radical prostatectomy: a pilot study
    Akin, Y.
    Avci, E.
    Gulmez, H.
    Akand, M.
    Ciftcioglu, M. Akif
    Bassorgun, I.
    Erdogru, T.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (18) : 2523 - 2529
  • [10] Frozen section evaluation of margins in radical prostatectomy specimens: a contemporary study and literature review
    Nunez, Amberly L.
    Giannico, Giovanna A.
    Mukhtar, Faisal
    Dailey, Virginia
    El-Galley, Rizk
    Hameed, Omar
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2016, 24 : 11 - 18