Balanced sampling: A versatile sampling approach for statistical soil surveys

被引:29
作者
Brus, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Probability sampling; Latin hypercube sampling; Digital soil mapping; Design-based estimation; Random forests; DESIGNS; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.04.009
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
In balanced sampling a linear relation between the soil property of interest and one or more covariates with known means is exploited in selecting the sampling locations. Recent developments make this sampling design attractive for statistical soil surveys. This paper introduces balanced sampling and demonstrates its potential utility and versatility. Latin hypercube sampling appears to be a special case of balanced sampling. When implemented as a balanced sampling design, the inclusion probabilities of the population units are known. Population parameters can then be estimated by design-based, model-assisted or model-based inference. In a simulation study balanced (b) random sampling, balanced coverage (bc) random sampling, and latin hypercube (lh) random sampling were compared in terms of the sampling distributions of number of unsampled marginal strata (U) measuring coverage of feature space, Mean Squared Shortest Distance (MSSD) measuring spatial coverage, and error in the estimated mean e. In designs b and bc four covariates were used as balancing variables. In bc the four covariates and the spatial coordinates were used as spreading variables. With lh the total sample size was random, but the size fluctuations were acceptable, Design lh clearly scored best with regard to U, but had by far the largest variance of e. Based on U and MSSD design bc outperformed design b, which can be explained by the use of spreading variables in bc. The variance of e for these designs was about 0.8 times the variance for simple random sampling. Using the ratio estimator for lh this variance ratio was about 1.8, showing the poor estimation performance of Ih. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 121
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Optimization of sample patterns for universal kriging of environmental variables [J].
Brus, Dick J. ;
Heuvelink, Gerard B. M. .
GEODERMA, 2007, 138 (1-2) :86-95
[2]   A sampling scheme for estimating the mean extractable phosphorus concentration of fields for environmental regulation [J].
Brus, DJ ;
Spätjens, LEEM ;
de Gruijter, JJ .
GEODERMA, 1999, 89 (1-2) :129-148
[3]   Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion) [J].
Brus, DJ ;
deGruijter, JJ .
GEODERMA, 1997, 80 (1-2) :1-44
[4]   Using regression models in design-based estimation of spatial means of soil properties [J].
Brus, DJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2000, 51 (01) :159-172
[5]  
Chauvet G., 2006, COMPUT STAT, P53
[6]   Efficient balanced sampling:: The cube method [J].
Deville, JC ;
Tillé, Y .
BIOMETRIKA, 2004, 91 (04) :893-912
[7]  
Falorsi PD, 2008, SURV METHODOL, V34, P223
[8]   On the effect of preferential sampling in spatial?prediction [J].
Gelfand, Alan E. ;
Sahu, Sujit K. ;
Holland, David M. .
ENVIRONMETRICS, 2012, 23 (07) :565-578
[9]   Doubly balanced spatial sampling with spreading and restitution of auxiliary totals [J].
Grafstrom, Anton ;
Tille, Yves .
ENVIRONMETRICS, 2013, 24 (02) :120-131
[10]   Spatially Balanced Sampling through the Pivotal Method [J].
Grafstrom, Anton ;
Lundstrom, Niklas L. P. ;
Schelin, Lina .
BIOMETRICS, 2012, 68 (02) :514-520