A mechanism for the skew of ensemble forecasts

被引:2
作者
Penland, Cecile [1 ]
Sardeshmukh, Prashant D. [2 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, ESRL, Phys Sci Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
ensemble forecasting; dynamics; processes; stochastic equations; model uncertainty; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; PREDICTABILITY; WEATHER; IMPACT; ERROR; LIMIT; NCEP;
D O I
10.1002/qj.4251
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
It is often not appreciated that forecast ensembles are generally skewed. The skew can arise from the state dependence of the chaotic system dynamics responsible for the ensemble spread. Generation of skew by this mechanism can be demonstrated in even the simplest dynamical system with state-dependent noise, and even when the initial and the asymptotic (i.e., the "climatological") forecast distributions are both symmetric. Indeed, forecast distributions of systems with state-dependent noise in the dynamical tendencies must in general be both skewed and heavy tailed, with implications for forecasting extreme anomaly risks. Ensemble forecast systems that misrepresent such state-dependent noise have state-dependent errors in their forecast probability distributions. Because such errors depend on both the initial condition and forecast lead time, they cannot be removed by simple a posteriori bias corrections of the forecast distributions. The ensemble standard deviation is often used as a simple metric of ensemble spread even when the forecast distribution is not Gaussian. In a similar spirit, the ensemble skew S may be used as a simple metric of the difference D between the ensemble-mean and most likely forecast, as well as the risk ratio R of extreme positive and negative deviations from the ensemble-mean forecast. This is motivated by the facts that (1) the probability distributions of many geophysical quantities are approximately stochastically generated skewed (SGS) distributions, for which simple analytical relationships exist between these quantities, and (2) Gaussian distributions are a sub-class of SGS distributions. However, S may serve as a useful metric of R and D even when the distributions are not strictly SGS distributions.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1143
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, STOCHASTIC PARAMETRI
  • [2] Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model:: From synoptic to decadal time-scales
    Bechtold, Peter
    Koehler, Martin
    Jung, Thomas
    Doblas-Reyes, Francisco
    Leutbecher, Martin
    Rodwell, Mark J.
    Vitart, Frederic
    Balsamo, Gianpaolo
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 134 (634) : 1337 - 1351
  • [3] Systematic Model Error: The Impact of Increased Horizontal Resolution versus Improved Stochastic and Deterministic Parameterizations
    Berner, J.
    Jung, T.
    Palmer, T. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2012, 25 (14) : 4946 - 4962
  • [4] A Spectral Stochastic Kinetic Energy Backscatter Scheme and Its Impact on Flow-Dependent Predictability in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System
    Berner, J.
    Shutts, G. J.
    Leutbecher, M.
    Palmer, T. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2009, 66 (03) : 603 - 626
  • [5] STOCHASTIC PARAMETERIZATION Toward a New View of Weather and Climate Models
    Berner, Judith
    Achatz, Ulrich
    Batte, Lauriane
    Bengtsson, Lisa
    de la Camara, Alvaro
    Christensen, Hannah M.
    Colangeli, Matteo
    Coleman, Danielle R. B.
    Crommelin, Daaaan
    Dolaptchiev, Stamen I.
    Franzke, Christian L. E.
    Friederichs, Petra
    Imkeller, Peter
    Jarvinen, Heikki
    Juricke, Stephan
    Kitsios, Vassili
    Lott, Francois
    Lucarini, Valerio
    Mahajan, Salil
    Palmer, Timothy N.
    Penland, Cecile
    Sakradzija, Mirjana
    von Storch, Jin-Song
    Weisheimer, Antje
    Weniger, Michael
    Williams, Paul D.
    Yano, Jun-Ichi
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 98 (03) : 565 - 587
  • [6] On the determination of the optimal parameters in the CAM model
    Bianucci, Marco
    Mannella, Riccardo
    [J]. CHAOS, 2021, 31 (03)
  • [7] Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System
    Buizza, R
    Miller, M
    Palmer, TN
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 125 (560) : 2887 - 2908
  • [8] BUIZZA R, 1995, J ATMOS SCI, V52, P1434, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<1434:TSVSOT>2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project
    Compo, G. P.
    Whitaker, J. S.
    Sardeshmukh, P. D.
    Matsui, N.
    Allan, R. J.
    Yin, X.
    Gleason, B. E., Jr.
    Vose, R. S.
    Rutledge, G.
    Bessemoulin, P.
    Broennimann, S.
    Brunet, M.
    Crouthamel, R. I.
    Grant, A. N.
    Groisman, P. Y.
    Jones, P. D.
    Kruk, M. C.
    Kruger, A. C.
    Marshall, G. J.
    Maugeri, M.
    Mok, H. Y.
    Nordli, O.
    Ross, T. F.
    Trigo, R. M.
    Wang, X. L.
    Woodruff, S. D.
    Worley, S. J.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 137 (654) : 1 - 28