The factor validity of the western Ontario rotator cuff index

被引:28
作者
Wessel, J [1 ]
Razmjou, H
Mewa, Y
Holtby, R
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Rehabil, Orthopaed & Arthrit Inst, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Med Programme, Cork, Ireland
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Orthopaed & Arthrit Inst, Sunnybrook & Womens Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-6-22
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index ( WORC) is a self- report questionnaire developed specifically to evaluate disability in persons with pathology of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. The authors created items in 5 categories based on a model of quality of life, but never validated this structure. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the original 5-domain model of the WORC by performing factor analysis. Methods: Three hundred twenty nine subjects ( age, mean: 52, SD: 12) were tested prior to undergoing surgery for rotator cuff pathologies. They completed the WORC, a self- report questionnaire, which has 21 items on the effect of the rotator cuff problem on symptoms, activities and emotions. Statistical calculations included correlations between items, Cronbach's alpha of the total scale and subscales, and principal component factor analysis with oblique rotation. Results: Correlations ranged from.09 to.70 between all the items, from.29 to.70 between items within a subscale, and from.53 to.72 between subscale scores. Cronbach's alpha was.93 for the total scale, and.72 to.82 for the subscales. The factor analysis produced 3 factors that explained 57% of the variance. The first factor included symptoms and emotional items, the second included strength items and the third included daily activities. Conclusion: The results of this study did not support the 5- domain model of the WORC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, DOI DOI 10.2310/6640.2003.2240
[2]   Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Bot, SDM ;
Terwee, CB ;
van der Windt, DAWM ;
Bouter, LM ;
Dekker, J ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2004, 63 (04) :335-341
[3]  
GETAHUN TY, J MUSCULOSKELET RES, V4, P119
[4]  
HOLTBY R, IN PRESS J SHOULDER
[5]   The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability - The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) [J].
Kirkley, A ;
Griffin, S ;
McLintock, H ;
Ng, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (06) :764-772
[6]   The development,and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index [J].
Kirkley, A ;
Alvarez, C ;
Griffin, S .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2003, 13 (02) :84-92
[7]   The development of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index [J].
Lo, IKY ;
Griffin, S ;
Kirkley, A .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2001, 9 (08) :771-778
[8]  
MACDERMID JC, IN PRESS J SHOULDER
[9]  
NORUSIS MJ, 1986, ADV STAT SPSSIPC CHI
[10]   Comparison of the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and the Simple Shoulder Test with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: Single-administration reliability and validity [J].
Roddey, TS ;
Olson, SL ;
Cook, KF ;
Gartsman, GM ;
Hanten, W .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2000, 80 (08) :759-768