Pregabalin versus gabapentin in partial epilepsy: a meta-analysis of dose-response relationships

被引:22
作者
Delahoy, Philippa [1 ]
Thompson, Sally [2 ]
Marschner, Ian C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Australia, Sydney, NSW 2114, Australia
[2] Pfizer Ltd UK, Surrey KT20 7NS, England
[3] Macquarie Univ, Dept Stat, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
ADD-ON TREATMENT; PARTIAL SEIZURES; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; THERAPY; TRANSPORT; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2377-10-104
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To compare the efficacy of pregabalin and gabapentin at comparable effective dose levels in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Methods: Eight randomized placebo controlled trials investigating the efficacy of pregabalin (4 studies) and gabapentin (4 studies) over 12 weeks were identified with a systematic literature search. The endpoints of interest were "responder rate" (where response was defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of seizures) and "change from baseline in seizure-free days over the last 28 days (SFD)". Results of all trials were analyzed using an indirect comparison approach with placebo as the common comparator. The base-case analysis used the intention-to-treat last observation carried forward method. Two sensitivity analyses were conducted among completer and responder populations. Results: The base-case analysis revealed statistically significant differences in response rate in favor of pregabalin 300 mg versus gabapentin 1200 mg (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.02, 3.25) and pregabalin 600 mg versus gabapentin 1800 mg (odds ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.21, 5.27). Both sensitivity analyses supported the findings of the base-case analysis, although statistical significance was not demonstrated. All dose levels of pregabalin (150 mg to 600 mg) were more efficacious than corresponding dosages of gabapentin (900 mg to 2400 mg) in terms of SFD over the last 28 days. Conclusion: In patients with refractory partial epilepsy, pregabalin is likely to be more effective than gabapentin at comparable effective doses, based on clinical response and the number of SFD.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]  
Bockbrader Howard N., 1995, Drugs of Today, V31, P613
[12]   The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bucher, HC ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Griffith, LE ;
Walter, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) :683-691
[13]  
Caldwell DM, 2007, LANCET, V369, P270, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60138-X
[14]   Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence [J].
Caldwell, DM ;
Ades, AE ;
Higgins, JPT .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521) :897-900
[15]  
CHADWICK D, 1990, LANCET, V335, P1114
[16]  
*COCHR COLL, 2005, COCHR HDB SYST REV I
[17]   Pregabalin add-on treatment in patients with partial seizures: A novel evaluation of flexible-dose and fixed-dose treatment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Elger, CE ;
Brodie, MJ ;
Anhut, H ;
Lee, CM ;
Barrett, JA .
EPILEPSIA, 2005, 46 (12) :1926-1936
[18]   Dose-response trial of pregabalin adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures [J].
French, JA ;
Kugler, AR ;
Robbins, JL ;
Knapp, LE ;
Garofalo, EA .
NEUROLOGY, 2003, 60 (10) :1631-1637
[19]   Seizure-free outcome in randomized add-on trials of the new antiepileptic drugs [J].
Gazzola, Deana M. ;
Balcer, Laura J. ;
French, Jacqueline A. .
EPILEPSIA, 2007, 48 (07) :1303-1307
[20]   When are indirect and mixed treatment comparisons biased? A graphical explanation with dags [J].
Jansen, J. P. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) :A169-A170