Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:749
作者
Vounzoulaki, Elpida [1 ,2 ]
Khunti, Kamlesh [1 ,2 ]
Abner, Sophia C. [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Bee K. [3 ]
Davies, Melanie J. [1 ]
Gillies, Clare L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Leicester Gen Hosp, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[2] Leicester Diabet Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res Appl Res Collaborat East Midla, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2020年 / 369卷
关键词
ABNORMAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; FOLLOW-UP; MELLITUS; RISK; POSTPARTUM; PREGNANCY; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.m1361
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To estimate and compare progression rates to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and healthy controls. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline and Embase between January 2000 and December 2019, studies published in English and conducted on humans. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Observational studies investigating progression to T2DM. Inclusion criteria were postpartum follow-up for at least 12 months, incident physician based diagnosis of diabetes, T2DM reported as a separate outcome rather than combined with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and studies with both a group of patients with GDM and a control group. RESULTS This meta-analysis of 20 studies assessed a total of 1 332 373 individuals (67 956 women with GDM and 1 264 417 controls). Data were pooled by random effects meta-analysis models, and heterogeneity was assessed by use of the I-2 statistic. The pooled relative risk for the incidence of T2DM between participants with GDM and controls was estimated. Reasons for heterogeneity between studies were investigated by prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and, overall, studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias (P=0.58 and P=0.90). The overall relative risk for T2DM was almost 10 times higher in women with previous GDM than in healthy controls (9.51, 95% confidence interval 7.14 to 12.67, P<0.001). In populations of women with previous GDM, the cumulative incidence of T2DM was 16.46% (95% confidence interval 16.16% to 16.77%) in women of mixed ethnicity, 15.58% (13.30% to 17.86%) in a predominantly non-white population, and 9.91% (9.39% to 10.42%) in a white population. These differences were not statistically significant between subgroups (white v mixed populations, P=0.26; white v non-white populations, P=0.54). Meta-regression analyses showed that the study effect size was not significantly associated with mean study age, body mass index, publication year, and length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Women with a history of GDM appear to have a nearly 10-fold higher risk of developing T2DM than those with a normoglycaemic pregnancy. The magnitude of this risk highlights the importance of intervening to prevent the onset of T2DM, particularly in the early years after pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Predictive factors of developing diabetes mellitus in women with gestational diabetes [J].
Åberg, AEB ;
Jönsson, EK ;
Eskilsson, I ;
Landin-Olsson, M ;
Frid, AH .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 81 (01) :11-16
[2]   Diabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance in women with previous gestational diabetes [J].
Albareda, M ;
Caballero, A ;
Badell, G ;
Piquer, S ;
Ortiz, A ;
de Leiva, A ;
Corcoy, R .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (04) :1199-1205
[3]   Obstetricians seldom provide postpartum diabetes screening for women with gestational diabetes [J].
Almario, Christopher V. ;
Ecker, Teresa ;
Moroz, Leslie A. ;
Bucovetsky, Lynne ;
Berghella, Vincenzo ;
Baxter, Jason K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 198 (05) :528.e1-528.e5
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[5]  
[Anonymous], PLOS MED
[6]   Post-partum follow-up of women with gestational diabetes mellitus: effectiveness, determinants, and barriers [J].
Aziz, Saleha ;
Munim, Tazeen Fatima ;
Fatima, Syeda Sadia .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (12) :1607-1612
[7]   Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bellamy, Leanne ;
Casas, Juan-Pablo ;
Hingorani, Aroon D. ;
Williams, David .
LANCET, 2009, 373 (9677) :1773-1779
[8]   Gaps in Diabetes Screening During Pregnancy and Postpartum [J].
Blatt, Amy J. ;
Nakamoto, Jon M. ;
Kaufman, Harvey W. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (01) :61-68
[9]   Systematic review with meta-analysis: use of 5-aminosalicylates and risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Bonovas, S. ;
Fiorino, G. ;
Lytras, T. ;
Nikolopoulos, G. ;
Peyrin-Biroulet, L. ;
Danese, S. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 45 (09) :1179-1192
[10]   What is gestational diabetes? [J].
Buchanan, Thomas A. ;
Xiang, Anny ;
Kjos, Sim L. ;
Watanabe, Richard .
DIABETES CARE, 2007, 30 :S105-S111