Combination of Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE) with sonographic and demographic characteristics in preoperative prediction of recurrence or progression of endometrial cancer

被引:12
作者
Eriksson, L. S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Nastic, D. [3 ,4 ]
Lindqvist, P. G. [5 ,6 ]
Imboden, S. [7 ]
Jarnbert-Pettersson, H. [6 ]
Carlson, J. W. [3 ,4 ]
Epstein, E. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Pelv Canc, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol & Cytol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oncol Pathol, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sjukhusbacken 10, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Soder Sjukhuset, Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
endometrial neoplasm; molecular diagnostics; neoplasm assessment; risk assessment; ultrasonography; CARCINOMA; GRADE; REPRODUCIBILITY; METASTASIS; SPECIMENS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/uog.23573
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the ability of demographic and sonographic variables and the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE) classification to predict preoperatively tumor recurrence or progression in women with endometrial cancer. Methods The study included 339 women with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer who underwent expert transvaginal ultrasound in a single center before surgery as part of the prospective International Endometrial Tumor Analysis 4 study or who were evaluated using the same protocol. The tumors were classified according to histotype, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) grade and FIGO stage. In addition, molecular analysis was performed for classification into the four ProMisE subtypes: polymerase-epsilon exonuclease domain mutations (POLE EDM), mismatch repair proteins deficiency (MMR-D), protein 53 wild type (p53 wt) and protein 53 abnormal (p53 abn). Demographic and preoperative sonographic characteristics, tumor recurrence or progression and survival were compared between the ProMisE subgroups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors associated with recurrence or progression, using univariable models to study crude associations and multivariable models to study adjusted associations. Logistic regression and receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC)-curve analysis were used to assess the predictive ability of the preoperative prognostic factors regarding recurrence or progression of cancer within 3 years after surgery, and to compare their predictive ability to that of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) preoperative (based on depth of myometrial invasion, histotype and grade) and postoperative (based on histotype, grade, surgical stage and lymphovascular space invasion) risk classifications. In a separate subanalysis, cases were stratified according to ProMisE p53 abn status (present vs absent) and sonographic tumor size (anteroposterior (AP) diameter < 2 cm vs >= 2 cm). Results Median follow-up time from surgery was 58 months (interquartile range, 48-71 months; range, 0-102 months). Recurrence or progression of cancer occurred in 51/339 (15%) women, comprising 14% of those with MMR-D, 8% of those with POLE EDM, 9% of those with p53 wt and 45% of those with p53 abn ProMisE subtype. On multivariable analysis, age, waist circumference, ProMisE subtype and tumor extension and AP diameter on ultrasound were associated with tumor recurrence or progression. A multivariable model comprising ProMisE subtype, age, waist circumference and sonographic tumor extension and size (area under the ROC curve (AUC), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93)) had comparable ability to predict tumor recurrence/progression to that of a multivariable model comprising histotype, grade, age, waist circumference and sonographic tumor extension and size (AUC, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92)), and better predictive ability than both the preoperative (AUC, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.82); P<0.01) and postoperative (AUC, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.86); P<0.01) ESMO risk classifications. Women with a combination of non-p53 abn subtype and tumor size < 2 cm (164/339 (48%)) had a very low risk (1.8%) of tumor recurrence or progression. Conclusions The combination of demographic characteristics, sonographic findings and ProMisE subtype had better preoperative predictive ability for tumor recurrence or progression than did the ESMO classification, supporting their use in the preoperative risk stratification of women with endometrial cancer. The combination of p53 status with ultrasound tumor size has the potential to identify preoperatively a large group of women with a very low risk of recurrence or progression. (C) 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 468
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Obesity and endometrial cancer survival: a systematic review [J].
Arem, H. ;
Irwin, M. L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2013, 37 (05) :634-639
[2]   Polymerase ε (POLE) ultra-mutation in uterine tumors correlates with T lymphocyte infiltration and increased resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in vitro [J].
Bellone, Stefania ;
Bignotti, Eliana ;
Lonardi, Silvia ;
Ferrari, Francesca ;
Centritto, Floriana ;
Masserdotti, Alice ;
Pettinella, Francesca ;
Black, Jonathan ;
Menderes, Gulden ;
Altwerger, Gary ;
Hui, Pei ;
Lopez, Salvatore ;
de Haydu, Christopher ;
Bonazzoli, Elena ;
Predolini, Federica ;
Zammataro, Luca ;
Cocco, Emiliano ;
Ferrari, Federico ;
Ravaggi, Antonella ;
Romani, Chiara ;
Facchetti, Fabio ;
Sartori, Enrico ;
Odicino, Franco E. ;
Silasi, Dan-Arin ;
Litkouhi, Babak ;
Ratner, Elena ;
Azodi, Masoud ;
Schwartz, Peter E. ;
Santin, Alessandro D. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 144 (01) :146-152
[3]   Predictive ability of maximal tumor diameter on MRI for high-risk endometrial cancer [J].
Bourgioti, Charis ;
Chatoupis, Konstantinos ;
Tzavara, Chara ;
Antoniou, Aristeidis ;
Rodolakis, Alexandros ;
Moulopoulos, Lia Angela .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (12) :2484-2495
[4]   The Importance of Body Composition in Explaining the Overweight Paradox in Cancer [J].
Caan, Bette J. ;
Feliciano, Elizabeth M. Cespedes ;
Kroenke, Candyce H. .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (08) :1906-1912
[5]   Endometrial carcinoma: controversies in histopathological assessment of grade and tumour cell type [J].
Clarke, Blaise A. ;
Gilks, C. Blake .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (05) :410-415
[6]   ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J].
Colombo, N. ;
Creutzberg, C. ;
Amant, F. ;
Bosse, T. ;
Gonzalez-Martin, A. ;
Ledermann, J. ;
Marth, C. ;
Nout, R. ;
Querleu, D. ;
Mirza, M. R. ;
Sessa, C. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) :16-41
[7]   Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer as defined by International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) consensus nomenclature: prospective multicenter study [J].
Epstein, E. ;
Fischerova, D. ;
Valentin, L. ;
Testa, A. C. ;
Franchi, D. ;
Sladkevicius, P. ;
Fruehauf, F. ;
Lindqvist, P. G. ;
Mascilini, F. ;
Fruscio, R. ;
Haak, L. A. ;
Opolskiene, G. ;
Pascual, M. A. ;
Alcazar, J. L. ;
Chiappa, V. ;
Guerriero, S. ;
Carlson, J. W. ;
Van Holsbeke, C. ;
Leone, F. P. Giuseppe ;
De Moor, B. ;
Bourne, T. ;
van Calster, B. ;
Installe, A. ;
Timmerman, D. ;
Verbakel, J. Y. ;
Van den Bosch, T. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 51 (06) :818-828
[8]   Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma [J].
Getz, Gad ;
Gabriel, Stacey B. ;
Cibulskis, Kristian ;
Lander, Eric ;
Sivachenko, Andrey ;
Sougnez, Carrie ;
Lawrence, Mike ;
Kandoth, Cyriac ;
Dooling, David ;
Fulton, Robert ;
Fulton, Lucinda ;
Kalicki-Veizer, Joelle ;
McLellan, Michael D. ;
O'Laughlin, Michelle ;
Schmidt, Heather ;
Wilson, Richard K. ;
Ye, Kai ;
Ding, Li ;
Mardis, Elaine R. ;
Ally, Adrian ;
Balasundaram, Miruna ;
Birol, Inanc ;
Butterfield, Yaron S. N. ;
Carlsen, Rebecca ;
Carter, Candace ;
Chu, Andy ;
Chuah, Eric ;
Chun, Hye-Jung E. ;
Dhalla, Noreen ;
Guin, Ranabir ;
Hirst, Carrie ;
Holt, Robert A. ;
Jones, Steven J. M. ;
Lee, Darlene ;
Li, Haiyan I. ;
Marra, Marco A. ;
Mayo, Michael ;
Moore, Richard A. ;
Mungall, Andrew J. ;
Plettner, Patrick ;
Schein, Jacqueline E. ;
Sipahimalani, Payal ;
Tam, Angela ;
Varhol, Richard J. ;
Robertson, A. Gordon ;
Pashtan, Itai ;
Saksena, Gordon ;
Onofrio, Robert C. ;
Schumacher, Steven E. ;
Tabak, Barbara .
NATURE, 2013, 497 (7447) :67-73
[9]   Poor Interobserver Reproducibility in the Diagnosis of High-grade Endometrial Carcinoma [J].
Gilks, C. Blake ;
Oliva, Esther ;
Soslow, Robert A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 37 (06) :874-881
[10]   European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Executive summary [J].
Graham, Ian ;
Atar, Dan ;
Borch-Johnsen, Knut ;
Boysen, Gudrun ;
Burell, Gunilla ;
Cifkova, Renata ;
Dallongeville, Jean ;
De Backer, Guy ;
Ebrahim, Shah ;
Gjelsvik, Bjorn ;
Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph ;
Hoes, Arno ;
Humphries, Steve ;
Knapton, Mike ;
Perk, Joep ;
Priori, Silvia G. ;
Pyorala, Kalevi ;
Reiner, Zeljko ;
Ruilope, Luis ;
Sans-Menendez, Susana ;
Reimer, Wilma Scholte Op ;
Weissberg, Peter ;
Wood, David ;
Yarnell, John ;
Zamorano, Jose Luis .
ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2007, 194 (01) :1-45