Neural crest induction by paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos requires FGF signals

被引:210
作者
Monsoro-Burq, AH [1 ]
Fletcher, RB [1 ]
Harland, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mol & Cellular Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
DEVELOPMENT | 2003年 / 130卷 / 14期
关键词
FGF; WNT; FGF8; paraxial mesoderm; Xenopus embryo; neural crest; neural patterning;
D O I
10.1242/dev.00531
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
At the border of the neural plate, the induction of the neural crest can be achieved by interactions with the epidermis, or with the underlying mesoderm. Wnt signals are required for the inducing activity of the epidermis in chick and amphibian embryos. Here, we analyze the molecular mechanisms of neural crest induction by the mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Using a recombination assay, we show that prospective paraxial mesoderm induces a panel of neural crest markers (Slug, FoxD3, Zic5 and Sox9), whereas the future axial mesoderm only induces a subset of these genes. This induction is blocked by a dominant negative (dn) form of FGFR1. However, neither dnFGFR4a nor inhibition of Wnt signaling prevents neural crest induction in this system. Among the FGFs, FGF8 is strongly expressed by the paraxial mesoderm. FGF8 is sufficient to induce the neural crest markers FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5 transiently in the animal cap assay. In vivo, FGF8 injections also expand the Slug expression domain. This suggests that FGF8 can initiate neural crest formation and cooperates with other DLMZ-derived factors to maintain and complete neural crest induction. In contrast to Wnts, eFGF or bFGF, FGF8 elicits neural crest induction in the absence of mesoderm induction and without a requirement for BMP antagonists. In vivo, it is difficult to dissociate the roles of FGF and WNT factors in mesoderm induction and neural patterning. We show that, in most cases, effects on neural crest formation were parallel to altered mesoderm or neural development. However, neural and neural crest patterning can be dissociated experimentally using different dominant-negative manipulations: while Nfz8 blocks both posterior neural plate formation and neural crest formation, dnFGFR4a blocks neural patterning without blocking neural crest formation. These results suggest that different signal transduction mechanisms may be used in neural crest induction, and anteroposterior neural patterning.
引用
收藏
页码:3111 / 3124
页数:14
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] AMAYA E, 1993, DEVELOPMENT, V118, P477
  • [2] EXPRESSION OF A DOMINANT NEGATIVE MUTANT OF THE FGF RECEPTOR DISRUPTS MESODERM FORMATION IN XENOPUS EMBRYOS
    AMAYA, E
    MUSCI, TJ
    KIRSCHNER, MW
    [J]. CELL, 1991, 66 (02) : 257 - 270
  • [3] Early induction of neural crest cells: lessons learned from frog, fish and chick
    Aybar, MJ
    Mayor, R
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 12 (04) : 452 - 458
  • [4] Wnt signaling in Xenopus embryos inhibits Bmp4 expression and activates neural development
    Baker, JC
    Beddington, RSP
    Harland, RM
    [J]. GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 13 (23) : 3149 - 3159
  • [5] Bang AG, 1997, DEVELOPMENT, V124, P2075
  • [6] Expression of Pax-3 in the lateral neural plate is dependent on a Wnt-mediated signal from posterior nonaxial mesoderm
    Bang, AG
    Papalopulu, N
    Goulding, MD
    Kintner, C
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 212 (02) : 366 - 380
  • [7] Timing and competence of neural crest formation
    Basch, ML
    Selleck, MAJ
    Bronner-Fraser, M
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 22 (03) : 217 - 227
  • [8] Paraxial-fated mesoderm is required for neural crest induction in Xenopus embryos
    Bonstein, L
    Elias, S
    Frank, D
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 193 (02) : 156 - 168
  • [9] THE STRUCTURE AND EXPRESSION OF THE XENOPUS KROX-20 GENE - CONSERVED AND DIVERGENT PATTERNS OF EXPRESSION IN RHOMBOMERES AND NEURAL CREST
    BRADLEY, LC
    SNAPE, A
    BHATT, S
    WILKINSON, DG
    [J]. MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 40 (1-2) : 73 - 84
  • [10] TCF: Lady justice casting the final verdict on the outcome of Wnt signalling
    Brantjes, H
    Barker, N
    van Es, J
    Clevers, H
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 383 (02) : 255 - 261